2007-05-21 06:15:17 · 39 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Life is life, whether it's a cow or a human. If you're truly "pro-life," then you shouldn't eat anything that was once alive.
2007-05-21 06:37:45 · update #1
Thanks, right-wingers, for not disappointing me. I had a good laugh.
2007-05-21 06:42:57 · update #2
They are not Pro-Life at all. What they are is Pro-Birth. They care more about a fetus then they care about life.
2007-05-21 06:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Pro-Life, Pro-Choice..........Please people lets get over this. I am Pro-Individual. Let me choose what's best for me and my life and You can choose what's best for your life. I do not believe in abortion, however I will not tell a woman that she cannot have one if she so chooses. Like any Pro-lifer and anyone else who believes in God, she will stand before our maker alone and be judged for what she has done in her life whether good or bad. I won't be there when that time comes , so I will not judge her now. I like eating hamburgers and steak, but if that is wrong in Gods eyes than only I will be judged on that, not you or the person who served me the Delicious cow.
2007-05-21 06:40:23 · answer #2 · answered by Baller76 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
My hamburger was raised to be eatten. It was raised for the consumption. The animal made it to birth, and then to grow in to a cow, or bull which ever.
I am pro-life for a reason. A child doesn't have the choice they are aborted before they ever make it out side of the body of their mother.
Now how in the world either of these have anything to do with each other is beyond me. They dont have anything to do with each other.
One is food, one is raised for that alone. The other is a child, a human.
2007-05-21 06:21:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
The "Lame" part of your name is certainly appropriate. What a lame argument.
Life is indeed life, and part of life...Nature if you will...is that creatures eat other creatures. Thankfully, we are higher in the food chain than most, but bunny rabbits, cows, chickens, etc., are not on this planet to just wander around and eat bugs and grass. They are here to provide sustenance to creatures higher in the food chain.
Now when I find out that women are EATING their aborted fetuses, we can talk. Until then, go hug a tree.
2007-05-21 07:21:04 · answer #4 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Simple. Conservatives know the difference between a human & a cow.
2007-05-21 06:26:42 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hamburgers taste good. Abortion kills humans. If you really can't tell the difference between a child and a cow you are hopeless
2007-05-21 06:27:22 · answer #6 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well, one is an animal put on the earth to feed us. The other is a precious new life, who can't help what Tri-mester he or she is in. Or why the parents were to lazy to use a condom.
Why do libs want to save the lives of murderers on death row, yet kill babies as a means of birth control?
Let others help you with this.......Pity you...
2007-05-21 06:28:18 · answer #7 · answered by Ken C 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Murdering a fetus is not a form of birth control, take the necessary precautions.
2007-05-21 07:08:42 · answer #8 · answered by It'sMe23 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are so many Liberals against the death penalty for homicidal killers, but are ok with an abortion of an innocent unborn baby?
Besides, cows get slaughtered for food, aborted fetuses get thrown in the trash.
2007-05-21 06:20:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Life is not life. There is nothing more valuable than human life and to compare it to cattle is demeaning.
2007-05-21 06:40:07 · answer #10 · answered by Brian 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋