English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Anyone answer this is a genius.

2007-05-21 06:02:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

14 answers

Stars vary in their age of course, but the universe is 13.7 billion years old and some stars have been going almost as long as that. So why are some stars endowed with such longevity and others are not?

Two reasons:

Some stars live longer than others. Some stars were "born" earlier than others.

Red dwarf stars live longer as they consume less energy and are at a lower temperature. Whereas blue giants can exhaust their fuel in a million years and then turn supernova when they run out of hydrogen to fuse,

One such red dwarf is our near neighbour Barnard's Star (5.96 light years away). Barnard's Star is a very low-mass star in the constellation Ophiuchus which was discovered by the astronomer E. E. Barnard in 1916. A very old star at 11 to 12 billion years, Barnard's Star has lost a great deal of rotational energy and periodic changes in its light indicate it rotates just once every 130 days (compared to just over 25 days for the Sun).

Our sun is less than 5 bllion years old i.e. the universe had been going strong for over 8 billion years before it was formed. As the moon and the planets only formed a little while after the Sun was formed (from the planetary nebula of material that it ejected) the answer has to be that the stars (in general) came first and the Moon came later.

There are however hot young blue stars such as members of the Pleiades Cluster in Taurus, which are near to us and therefore formed after our Sun was formed, so there are exceptions to that pattern.

2007-05-21 06:20:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Stars

2007-05-21 06:05:34 · answer #2 · answered by Mohit T 2 · 1 0

Stars had to come first because of the composition of rock/dust material on the moon. The moon is made up of almost exactly the same material the Earth is. This means that heavy metals exist on the moon too. Heavy metals had to be produced in stars, as all matter was once Hydrogen atoms. Without stars and star nova's, we don't get rock planets or their satellites (moons).

2007-05-21 06:29:27 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin B 3 · 0 0

Stars. Our solar system is about 4.5 billion years old. The moon was created after a rogue planet collided with Earth, so it's a bit younger even than than the sun. Other stars are much older - some over 10 billion years. Of course, new stars are still being born, so some stars are younger than the moon.

2007-05-21 06:08:31 · answer #4 · answered by injanier 7 · 2 0

Stars!

2007-05-21 07:22:52 · answer #5 · answered by t-rex 2 · 0 0

STARS! the sun formed before any planets or moons were formed in our solar system. In our universe still stars before any rocks. Stars create heavier matter that is there purpose.

Stars convert hydrogen(gas) into helium(gas)
Large stars create other matter in the core. (such as iron)
When those large stars explode iron and other matter go into space
Matter attracts matter (gravity)
new stars are born
if enough matter is left over after star born, planets are born

*if need any more info look-up nucleosynthesis

which also explains why some elements are more abundant then others.

2007-05-21 06:39:41 · answer #6 · answered by HiddenBehindTheBushesAgain 1 · 0 0

it particularly is in all threat the worst piece of "data" in want of a conspiracy. There are no longer any stars in the photos simply by fact the exposure circumstances of the cameras have been a procedures too short. the celebs are basically too faint to manifest. it particularly is a few thing that could particularly examined back in the international; set a instruction manual digital camera for a sunlight hours exposure and take a photograph of the evening sky. The Moon might manifest, yet stars does not. The astronauts did no longer checklist seeing stars from the exterior simply by fact their eyes have been adjusted to the vivid floor of the Moon. In vivid gentle, the iris of the attention contracts to decrease the quantity of sunshine that is going into the attention. This heavily limits the skill of the attention to concurrently see vivid products - like the lunar floor - and faint products, like stars. so they could no longer see stars at a similar time as on the Moon's floor, and for good reason. in case you do not have faith this, anticipate a clean evening. pass stand under a vivid streetlight, and seek for. Your eyes will adjust to the brightness of the gentle and, in doing so, ward off you from seeing stars. The astronauts reported seeing stars whilst they have been removed from vivid gentle, tremendously whilst on the evening edge of the Moon.

2016-12-29 17:11:26 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

From what i understand the stars came first, and the sudsequent planets and moons, asteroids etc, all came from the left over material from the star's forming, and actually the moons would have come after the planets, having been what was left over from the planetismals

2007-05-21 06:06:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Stars. The first stars converted hydrogen to the elements up to iron, the first supernovas created the rest of the elements. These elements later made up the moon, etc.

2007-05-21 06:24:40 · answer #9 · answered by Michael B 5 · 0 0

The stars came before anything else

2007-05-24 15:12:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers