Please answer ASAP >>Why shouldn't an airport be built in Antarctica??

Question

This is for a project. All opinions welcome. I will be very greatful if you could answer this question.
Thank you :)

Answer 1

There is an airport in Antarctica, it's controlled by the military. Getting in and out is very difficult due to the rapidly changing weather and many flights get almost there before a storm blows in and they have to turn around. You can visit Antarctica but its easier by boat, National Geographic takes people down there every year (for a price of course).

Answer 2

Construction costs money, effort. When we build, we see that the cost is corresponds with the profit we expect to get. To build an airport in Antarctica, we need to see how often it will be used, and the type of airplane to be used. The continent is not inhabited, and it is visited by research teams. Offhand, I would say those research may be suspended suddenly, and there may be nobody there, therefore the airport may see little or no usage. Also, the weather is harsh, and any construction will wear out faster than in other places. Finally, since the weather is harsh, the best aircraft to use are small, which may land on any level terrain, not necessarily a pavemented surface. The existence of such airplanes makes it unnecessary to build an airport.

Answer 3

Weather conditions is a major concern. The pollution from the airport is considerable. Most of the ice is under considerable strains and can crack apart at anytime. Not the best idea for a runway. Especially when the weight of the plain and the added heat of the engines can increase the strains.

Sea planes (those landing in the water) are not much better off. This is mainly due to calving of the glaciers forming ice burgs.

Finally the cost-to-profit ratio is out of whack. Construction costs far outweigh the money generated from passenger use.

Answer 4

Antarctica is the 5th greatest continent in section after Asia, Africa , North united statesa. and South united statesa.. besides the undeniable fact that, it extremely is thru some distance the smallest in inhabitants : certainly, it has no everlasting inhabitants in any respect. it is likewise the continent with the utmost widely used altitude and the backside widely used of any continent in the international. » Antarctica has no everlasting citizens, yet multiple governments take care of everlasting learn stations on the continent. maximum travelers pass to the Antarctic Peninsula and offshore islands to confirm our surroundings, the flowers and fauna and multiple the historic web sites of the early explorers. A small yet increasing minority are actually finding for different activities in Antarctica are sky diving, mountaineering, surfing, diving, ski strolling - which will pose confusing protection matters sooner or later. in the previous few years, Antarctica has gotten so famous, extremely with travellers interested in nature-based tourism, that concerns have been raised proper to the continent's delicate environment.The continent is vaguely around in shape - like a circle drawn via an toddler or a cookie with a pair great bites taken out of it.

Answer 5

There are airports (airfields) in Antarctica. They are probably all close to research stations. The airport runways in Antarctica are ice not concrete.

Answer 6

Along with the excellent reasons already given, operating aircraft in that climate is always high in risk. There is also no reason to dump more greenhouse gases in a region already experiencing the degradation of the ozone layer.

Answer 7

no one lives there except scientist....it would be a complete waste of time and money to build an airport there. Because of the weather conditions down there it might not even be possible.

Answer 8

No one would want to work at the airport
Only scientists would go there
No commercial airline would fly there
No trade
too much work to construct the airport

Answer 9

Because the planes leaving there would always go north. I wouldn't recommend it