The Supreme Court made separation of church and state the law of the land in 1948. Is Bush a criminal?

Question

Why do the conservatives hate the constitution?

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/#52149

Answer 1

Bush is a criminal for many reasons, including violating separation of church and state.
Conservatives hate the Constitution becuase it serves as an obstacle to their agenda of establishing a totalitarian theocracy in the United States.

Answer 2

sure. Loving v. Virginia M. L. B. v. S. L. J. Moore v East Cleveland Skinner v Oklahoma Meyer v Nebraska those are rulings upholding the duty of states to uphold the assumption of marriage. Marriage is an element of the religious enterprise. Marriage is the literal binding of souls between a guy and a woman. that is why one is committing adultery while a individual remarries after a divorce while the two events are nonetheless alive. while the Roman Empire fell, the Catholic church took over each and every of the marriage regulations. King Henry VIII of britain replaced into very dissatisfied with the Catholic church over the marriage regulations and desperate to style the Church of britain so he could marry and divorce at will. The Church of britain continues to be headed via the nobility to on the instant time. while the U.S. grew to become its very own u . s ., it held onto English undemanding regulation inclusive of marriage in spite of the actuality that it won't have using theory of separation of church and state. The suited courtroom could have taken The Church of britain out of government regulation, yet left it in. A suited courtroom quote: "we are dealing right here with legislations which incorporates between the common civil rights of guy. Marriage and procreation are undemanding to the very existence and survival of the race." because of the fact of this states might nicely be in contact in soul binding, that's what marriage skill.

Answer 3

No, he is not a criminal. He is a Christian, as have been most of his predecessors.

Though the Supreme Court has made several rulings on church/state issues over the years, none of them created a crime for being Christian or any other religion.

As to the second part of your question, I think you will find it is liberals, not conservatives that keep adding to the constitution. Conservative justices are much more likely to look at the document itself rather than personal preferences when writing decisions.

And good luck on finding the phrase "separation of church and state" in the constitution.

Answer 4

Liberals

Answer 5

Libel and Slander are laws in which you broken with this post. Writing an accusation without proof. You read liberal blog sites though so you wouldn't understand. Unless they tell you something it most certainly isn't true. Not only are you a sheep, but a blind one at that.

Answer 6

first the Supreme court cannot make any Law a Law of the Land that is A Congress Thing Big Dummy
Next read the Constitution it Does NOt say Seperation of Church and State.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

Answer 7

NO! It's also in consti. that the president should act accordingly so just to protect his country and his people against any dangerour act or attack. And he did that so well at 911. Who amongst us can have the courage to attack back and knowingly danger of any kind was put in his head and his family?

Answer 8

Bush is a criminal for several reasons. That is just one of many. It does seem at times that our conservative friends do have a disregard for the Constitution.

President Bush called the Constitution a goddamn piece of paper and Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General, referred to it as obsolete.

Answer 9

Supreme Court cases have been over turned throughout history.

Brown vs. the Board of education overturned Plessy v. Ferguson. By what you are saying, segregation should be legal.

Answer 10

No. Somebody better tell the S. Ct. to take down their 10 Commandments, if that's the case.

Which, of course, it isn't. It is the Liberals who have tried to say that God has been booted from the public square, but that is a mis-representation of the Establishment clause, including any legal interpretation thereof.