I think they should've won, they were the side which were more entertaining to watch and (speaking from a United fan's persepective) were the first to score in a game which saw chelsea playing overcautious defense.
Hopefully this will not be the case in the Community Shield, I am hoping to see a game which both sides go at each other and not a tactical deadlock like last saturday
2007-05-21 04:10:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sound_of_the_Bastard 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course they should. They are just a better team. I know thats not a great reason but Chelsea are so boring and play every game the same, and they proved that at the weekend by scoring at the last minute as usual! i think it should have gone to penalties, then ManU would have won!
2007-05-21 04:08:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO.. the game was equally poised until drogbas goal.. there was nothing in it.. Neither team played well enough to actually "deserve" to win it on the day but hats off to chelsea for pulling it off.. As for the disputed giggs goal the referree called it right..it wasnt a goal..
2007-05-21 05:18:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by jadoo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. They shouldn't. I think Chelsea is more deserve to win that Cup. The reason is, MU has won the Premiere League, Chelsea, hasnt won anything. So I think, the cup is deserved to Chelsea
2007-05-21 04:00:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by zoelz s 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yet again another cup final where united dominated and lost!! arsenal 2 years ago!! but that is football mate but the european cup is coming back to manchester next year when we take it back off milan!!!
2007-05-21 04:07:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by PISTON BROKE (Nick 2 utds) 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
man u didn't deserve to win.
we all heard about the so great cr7 , what was he worth during the match?
is wayne rooney a genuine striker.? cant he shoot the ball in between the two posts and not around them.?
for me the only man u player who deserves some appreciation for his performence is giggs. he got unlucky about that goal which was not allowed
2007-05-21 03:59:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by sushmit_101 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
ok....first and fore most.....it is a goal....
if it was foul on the keeper, the ref should have blown the whistle....if it was suppose to be a penalty and ref gives advantage and did not score, it should still be a penalty.....
and...
cech was dumb enough to stand so close to the line when rooney's pass came into the box...he could have pressured giggs and giggs could see him coming and would not try to slide.....
so.....
i'd say im not a sore loser....but no one deserve to win it...it should be a tie and gone into penalties....
poor referring......
and i think no one deserve to win......meaning they should have gone into penalties.....and from there who do well then deserve the win
2007-05-21 04:06:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alicia 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. If they should, they would. You play the games for a reason. If they do not win, then they didn't deserve it. The team that deserves it is the team that wins.
2007-05-21 04:01:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chelsea won the FA Cup and they deserved it...end of story.
2007-05-21 03:57:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
yes if giggs goal should have been allowed
we would have defended and then drogba wouldnt have got his goal
and then we would have won!
2007-05-21 04:10:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Frihah Anti-Milanist 4lyf! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋