You insisit that women should be able to choose whatever or not to abort a innocent child. Well the next time a man kills a women or a man kills another man we will be sure to tell you to mind your own business cause this is a man matter. And that you have no voice in the matter cause your women, and the perpatrators where men, same thing as you pro choice people.
somebody dies and only women get the voice.
(Trying to speak from the point of veiw of Pro choice.)
(Yes i know it would be considered Sexist but that is what i have to say to you pro choice ingrates.)
2007-05-21
03:18:29
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Proud Michigander
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Oh yeah compare a growing fetus to a parasite very nice.
2007-05-22
14:21:27 ·
update #1
Both are acts of murder, The Fetus is PREVENTED from living.
What i am saying is that killing a Fetus is the same as murder, you are Preventing the life of a child and their is a core democrat value called, The Right to Life.
Then you get people saying that only women should choose in since its inside them.
Who has the Right to killing or preventing the life of a child, or any other human for that matter, Who has the right to say who lives and who dies.
I am simply holding up a mirror for the Pro Choice Murderers.
2007-05-22
14:25:21 ·
update #2
Both are acts of murder, The Fetus is PREVENTED from living.
What i am saying is that killing a Fetus is the same as murder, you are Preventing the life of a child and their is a core democrat value called, The Right to Life.
Then you get people saying that only women should choose in since its inside them.
Who has the Right to killing or preventing the life of a child, or any other human for that matter, Who has the right to say who lives and who dies.
I am simply holding up a mirror for the Pro Choice Murderers.
2007-05-22
14:25:27 ·
update #3
ARE YOU BLIND JAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-05-22
14:26:35 ·
update #4
ARE YOU BLIND JAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-05-22
14:26:44 ·
update #5
Edko do you even know what a Gulag is?
I assure you i am not Josef Stalin.
I also assure you i am no Russian.
2007-05-22
14:28:40 ·
update #6
Pro choice is both illogical and immoral. That is the end of the matter.
2007-05-21 03:53:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
You probably do not realize how idiotic you sound, but comparing a fetus that is still inside the womb to a living breathing person that has been born is like comparing a shoe to a banana. There is NO comparison.
Besides-what it all bottles down to is :Mind your own business! How hard is it to worry about your own life and choices? It is inside the woman's body, that's why it's her choice! When women have babies, it is THEM that has to endure the pregnancy, SHE has to endure labor/delivery, she will have to raise the child on her own b/c the man can walk away. And that's exactly what happens too often. You don't care at all about these women that you WISH you could force to carry their pregnancies to term, nor do you care about the fetuses.You just want to take CONTROL.
It is not your business, you have no say whatsoever in the matter, you can cry anti abortion until you're bone dry, but it still will never never never be your concern.
And abortion will never I repeat never go away, so don't waste your time. Should spend your energy of things that you have a say in and is worthy of change.Need help? Here's an example: how about global warming?
2007-05-22 03:33:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by (no subject) 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am a pro-life libertarian but most libertarians are pro-choice. The debate with the NAP is whether or not the unborn baby can be considered a human or not. Even those who say it does will claim that it is living parasitically on the mother and therefore she has the right to kill it as self defense. Personally I believe that since the baby was conceived through direct actions of the parents and no choice of its own, so it is not a parasite. However I am torn when it is in cases of rape, because it was not through consensual action of the mother. Overall yes most libertarians are pro choice, Gary Johmson wanted to ban it for the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. But some libertarians are pro life: Ron Paul (although he thinks it should be a state decision) and Bob Barr
2016-05-18 22:23:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by anna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me ask you this. You go into a bar where you are drugged (against your will) and raped. You get pregnant. I can't even be sure of the identity of the father. This happened to someone I know. Should the government force her to carry the pregnancy full term? If not, then why not? If the fetus is a child according to the pro-life position, then why should there be an exception to an abortion ban because of rape?
It's a "woman's" issue because women are the ones who get pregnant. That's what makes your analogy flawed at best..
2007-05-21 03:54:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Was thankful that an abortion was harder in the mid sixties than now, otherwise I would probably not be here.
I in turn spent my childhood growing up in foster homes, but nevertheless I am grateful for a chance at life, I am prolife.
have to be after my experience, I just can see both sides but no one factors in the childs choice, how many would choose life?
How many of you would choose life, its easier if we are doing the choosing not so much if someone else is.
I have four children now they woould not be here if my mother made this choice.
Don't agree with his reasoning though, I think murder is murder.
2007-05-21 03:26:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jack L. W. 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well, in actuality, pro-choice women seem to think it is okay to kill any sex, male or female, and these babies can't fight for their lives. Many women can fight for theirs against a man attacker. They were born, and have strength, and weapons, that is why. Babies have nothing, but the grace of humans, and their mother's. Pro-choice people don't grasp that they are guilty of murder, even if they never aborted a baby. They condone it, therefore are as guilty of the crime, as those who commit it. This poem about abortion has been removed twice before, but to help you get your point across, I will re-copy it. Someone save the innocent babies, please.
Pretty Butterfly, Don't Cry
Like stepping on a butterfly,
Who is wet, and cannot fly.
And, on the sidewalk, trying to dry,
Knowing rain, the reason why,
That, it's own beauty could not shine,
Until the tears of God's great sky,
Would set it free, so sparkles climb,
And come to shallow human eyes.
But so, it never did arrive,
That it's life, could live, but died.
And, all that flashed within it's mind,
Was that love didn't come, this time,
As the whim of foot declined.
Oh, don't cry, pretty butterfly!
Your life, snuffed out, not defined!
Never mind. Go ahead, and cry.
Tracy L Richards
Copyright ©2007 Tracy L. Richards
2007-05-21 03:41:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
Your "question" (which is not so much a question as a rant) is ridiculous. When a murder is committed by a man, the victim wasn't inside the man's body, using his body as an incubator.
When you can figure out a way for a man to carry a child, then he can make a decision about whether or not to do it.
Besides, I'm not pro-choice because it's a "women's issue," I'm pro-choice because I don't think the government has the right to force you to do anything with your body that you don't want to do.
2007-05-21 03:29:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
Can I scratch my arm and kill a million skin cells? They are alive and just about as conscious as a zygote.
Why are Republicans so ani government, except when it comes to the womb?
2007-05-21 03:39:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
You hit it right on the nose there. You are sexist, and bigoted to boot.
You have no clue what "Pro-Choice" really means, so don't post smut until you educate yourself on what we stand for.
And I don't mean what your religion, or political party's dogma dictates we are, find real facts.
Pro-choice is NOT pro-abortion. It is pro-birth control, pro-education, and to the utmost pro-self control.
EDIT:
Anthony: So according to your ideology, I'm a murderer because I miscarried my pregnancy.
2007-05-21 03:32:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by tiny Valkyrie 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Even the bible does not consider something alive until it breaths. "and god breathed life into Adam"
and it addresses the situation directly by ordering the fining of someone that causes a woman to miscarry rather than under the thou shalt not kill commandment.
"If you cause a woman to miscarry you shall pay the father 6 shekels of silver"
2007-05-21 03:24:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by sprcpt 6
·
7⤊
3⤋