English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is a documented fact their families have done business with each other, and I know George HW Bush has met with Bin Ladens. Did he ever meet Osama? If you have any documented evidence, please let me know.

2007-05-21 01:26:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I never said anything about Iraq. This question has nothing to do with Iraq, Colt guy.

2007-05-21 01:48:09 · update #1

9 answers

It stands to reason that the Sr Bush did. He was CIA when Osama Bin Laden was a paid CIA informant and operative. OBL and the Taliban actually worked for the US at one time.

2007-05-21 01:42:19 · answer #1 · answered by SlickWillie 3 · 4 1

There is a book called House of Bush House of Saud, it chronicles the two families and the oil and their relationship. It mentions Bush Sr, James Baker and others going to Saudi Arabia in the late 60's or early 70's and seeing Osama Bin Laden.

2007-05-21 01:37:05 · answer #2 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 4 1

Yes. The Bin Ladens and Bush families are close personal friends.

2007-05-21 01:59:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Michael Moore's highly critical theatrical documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 alleges strong business connections between the Bush family and the bin Laden family. Moore based most of his claims on Craig Unger's House of Bush, House of Saud which relates how Salem bin Laden invested through James R. Bath, the sole U.S. business representative for Salem bin Laden, some money in Arbusto Energy, a company run by George W. Bush .

Several members of the Bush family are investors in the Carlyle Group, a defense contractor and investment fund with numerous interests in the Mideast, run by former Bush administration Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci. The media noted that former President George H. W. Bush attended an investment meeting at the Washington, D.C. Ritz-Carlton hotel on September 10, 2001 and in particular a meeting with Shafiq bin Laden, representing joint interests of the Saudi Binladin Group and Carlyle. (Bush did not attend the morning of September 11, although it has been alleged that the meeting took place during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Former Secretary of State James Baker was present, along with Carlucci.) The Carlyle and Binladin groups mutually severed their business relationship on October 26, 2001.

The New York Times reported that beginning on September 11, the bin Laden family were quickly called together by officials from the Saudi Embassy, which feared that they might become the victims of American reprisals. With approval from the F.B.I., according to a Saudi official, the bin Ladens flew by private jet from Los Angeles to Orlando, then on to Washington, D.C. and finally to Boston. Once the FAA permitted overseas flights, the jet flew to Europe.

2007-05-21 01:38:04 · answer #4 · answered by Shay 3 · 1 1

Probably not, Osama was always the black sheep of the family. . . 41 had some dealings with the Bin Laden construction company, but Osama was never associated with it - and isn't even considered part of the family anymore either...

2007-05-21 01:32:25 · answer #5 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 1 1

Funny who it always turns out the Bush family is friends with. The amazing revelation back in the eighties was that they were family friends of the Hinkleys. Their 'black sheep son' was the guy that shot Reagan. Matter of record. Strange how people let such odd things go uncommented.

The Bushes are America's Borgias.

2007-05-21 01:38:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

we financed osama thru the CIa...we did a great job, he did what Bush cartel needed. started a war industry based on fear...a pretty good $$ scam as billions find thier way into offshore banks and swiss banks...watch some 9-11 videos on youtube..

2007-05-21 01:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by generationZ 4 · 3 1

Maybe at a Republican Party Fundraising event.

2007-05-21 01:32:01 · answer #8 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1 1

Bill Clinton and the Dems let Bin Laden's pilots train IN THE FREAKING U.S.

2007-05-21 01:29:22 · answer #9 · answered by duck 2 · 1 5

Everyone blaming Bush is a Liberal. And that's ok, because our Country is all about blaming the other side. Let's not forget what the Liberals said about going to war against Iraq.(I mean BEFORE they changed their minds)

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2007-05-21 01:34:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

fedest.com, questions and answers