English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do we really have them libs are going after talk radio fairness doctrine where they can silence conservative radio and only that they are not affected so republicans cant go on there shows with someone they disagree with on there time that is unfair to me. Then theres freedom of Religion thats ok as long its not Christianity.

2007-05-21 00:46:42 · 11 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government Politics

so im stupid an idiot because im republican and listen to Rush I say screw you.

2007-05-21 00:55:20 · update #1

11 answers

Absolutely 100% correct Check out House Bills 254, 984 and 1592. They do not cover pregnant women, children under 18, court witnesses, off duty retired police officers and off duty Military personnel! So much for Tolerance.

2007-05-21 01:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 0 0

The fairness doctrine used to be the law in this country. Under the fairness doctrine, your show had to present two sides on every issue. So, a liberal show would have to have a conservative, and vice versa.

The truth is, most liberal shows already have conservative guests and callers on their shows. Thom Hartmann is one of my favorites.

Rush does also make an effort to be fair by giving liberals time to talk, I will say that.
Hannity is the worst, he's like the radio nazi. The second someone disagrees with him, he's yelling, screaming, hanging up on them. He's terrible.

Oh, and if liberals are so "anti Christian" as you claim, then why are the only 3 with a hope of being the Democratic nominee..Clinton, Obama, and Edwards all Christians?

Why don't you just vote for Ron Paul? He's a Christian and he's probably against the fairness doctrine.

2007-05-21 01:02:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Truth B. Told's answer only told part of it. Yes christianity is uner attack by pop culture, but thats better than the rest of the world being under attack by christianity. At least pop culture doesnt torture and kill people like christianity has.

And freedom of speech is disappearing, every timne somebody like Don Imus gets fired for saying something unpopular but true, we all lose some freedom.

2007-05-21 00:59:17 · answer #3 · answered by Rich F 3 · 1 0

I am really trying to understand your question.
" Freedom of speech of religion" is threatend by " libs" who attack conservative talk radio? Since I never listen to talk radio its a non issue for me and surely you can't proove Christianity is under attack. It seems to me that certain Christian nationalists and dominionists would love to create a Jesus - based theocracy here in the US. That would not be constitutional, would it?

2007-05-21 01:10:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You misunderstand the fairness doctrine, it means that each station has to give both sides time to speak. Sounds fair to me, are you afraid that the conservatives and Christians cannot win on a level playing field? You don't give them enough credit.

2007-05-21 01:05:34 · answer #5 · answered by ash 7 · 1 0

Why are conservatives so afraid of Rush Limbaugh being challenged by someone with a brain to save all his dim witted listeners from swallowing his lies as if they were truth.
Hell as far as I am concerned they are doing America a public service, they are stopping the dumbing down of America.

Do you really believe for one moment that Rush could debate Noam Chomsky ???

2007-05-21 00:52:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes, that's freedom OF, not freedom FROM. Christianity has long been under attack by pop culture. I can only attribute that to fear and ignorance.

2007-05-21 00:51:37 · answer #7 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1 0

freedom is only talked in few nations ' developed and developing nations, do talk on them, debate on them.

after 9 /11 there are plenty beleivers who talk about Jesus Christ and the Churches are over flowing , because people feel Jesus Christ is their only saviour above all powers including politics and politicians.

2007-05-21 00:55:05 · answer #8 · answered by david j 5 · 0 1

It may not be freedom "from" religion, but it should be. Organized religion is a cancer to this world.

2007-05-21 01:02:56 · answer #9 · answered by Monk 4 · 2 0

Re-read your sentence. It really doesn't make much sense. I kind of understand where you're going, but it's one long run-on sentence that leads nowhere. The period and the comma are your friends.

2007-05-21 00:52:29 · answer #10 · answered by TheOrange Evil 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers