English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yay or Nay

2007-05-20 15:23:08 · 29 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government Politics

29 answers

Unlikely.

2007-05-20 15:25:12 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 2 4

Nay

2007-05-20 22:50:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Nay. As of now he is only the worst since Bill Clinton. He will be remembered for standing up to Islamofascists.

2007-05-20 23:12:52 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 1

Yay .


Edit to Leeann.. so you say Bush wont go down for the worst president ever but the congress will.. You do know the very congress was Bush's Blank Check Congress...they were Republicans. So I think she meant Yay...

2007-05-20 22:29:44 · answer #4 · answered by bs b 4 · 3 2

Yay

2007-05-20 23:07:27 · answer #5 · answered by tk 4 · 1 1

If you are talking about approval ratings, he has a ways to go to match Jimmy Carter at 21%. It was Jimmy Carter who triggered this mess in the Middle East when he helped dispose of the Shah of Iran who was pro-American and did nothing to prevent the rise to power of the Ayatolla Khemeni. It was Jimmy Carter who allowed the imprisonment of the American embassy employees which was in fact an act of war. The embassy employees were imprisoned for 444 days until the day of Reagan's inauguration.

2007-05-20 22:39:37 · answer #6 · answered by John W 5 · 1 2

I often wondered who the 26% of Americans who still support the village idiot were hiding, and here there are! Its so sad that our poor coke snorting, soldier killing, piece of summer fun between the toes leader still has a few lackeys prostituting themselves to support him. I carried an M60 during VietNam, I cant remember seeing the village idiot in country. Oh thats right, village idiot refused to take a medical exam because he had a runny nose. Is he one of the worst in the history of our country. Without a doubt yes. He has started a needless war that has seen over three thousand good soldiers killed. One of my own kids shot. Yeah, he's a real winner.

2007-05-20 22:42:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Personally I think he should. But most say he has led us through one of the worst wars in history, BUT if you think about it, we wouldnt be in this war if it werent for him. I know 9/11 happened and Osama started it, but we went after the wrong person for it. We threw Saddam out of his position and killed him, which was a good thing. A VERY GOOD thing. But in my opinion he did it all wrong. He lied to us. And for lying to us Clinton was impeached. So why dont we go after Bush for doing just that? Our economy is at one of its worst in the last 50 years. Look at the unemployment rates, pay rates, look at gas prices, look at our country. I mean personally I think he should be held accountable for his actions, and for not taking care of his country as much as he wants to take care of Iraq. I think he should start looking here before he looks at what to change next. How about raising minimum wage, how about fixing health care, how about paying the military more... not JUST the ARMY. All of the branches are over there. How about giving the 880 MILLION BACK to the Air Force that he took away to give to Army for Iraq. How about Bush just make a damn timeline for leaving Iraq and let everyone come home instead of getting killed or wounded because the people over there dont care about what the hell we are trying to accomplish. And just realise we arent going to get their damn OIL. Thats all this is... AN OIL WAR! Sorry I am ranting.

2007-05-20 22:35:48 · answer #8 · answered by brandywine840213 3 · 2 2

Probably not. Public opinion often changes with time. Abraham Lincoln had one of the lowest approval ratings of any president in history during his presidency. Of course that changed with time. Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson also were unpopular in their day. All four of these presidents have one thing in common, they were (are) the president during the time of an unpopular war.

2007-05-20 22:33:46 · answer #9 · answered by LawDawg 5 · 1 3

he will go down in history as having to deal with three very tough issues. 9-11, Katrina,and liberal Dem's. it is easy to sit at home and play Monday morning quarterback,but anyone being honest with themselves,will know he has never backed down,even when polls hit rock bottom. either way,he will always be a past president,have 24 hour protection,and write books and make millions.

2007-05-20 22:34:24 · answer #10 · answered by '' GUV '' 3 · 2 3

Looks like the wackos are out in force tonight.

Lowest approval rating since WW2 and he's top 5?

What drugs are you on currently and will you share?! Soon as I'm done laughing, I'll probably be quite disturbed over that astounding degree of denial.

2007-05-20 22:31:49 · answer #11 · answered by Josh 4 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers