Of course, I am talking about the ones that were in Iraq!
2007-05-20 14:27:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
you know they are.
2007-05-20 14:31:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Everyone, starting with Clinton in 1998, and followed by Democratic leaders up to the Iraq invasion were claiming Saddam had WMD's and we should do something about it. When the war began to go sour, the Democrats developed selective memories and blamed Bush for invading Iraq under "false" reasons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE
Where are the WMD's now? Probably in Syria. Russia was the main supplier of WMD's to Saddam (anything to make money after the breakup of the Soviet Union). While we were in Afghanistan, both Russia and Saddam knew that an invasion of Iraq was next. so Russia trucked all of evidence of WMD's across the border to Syria.
http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/2003/msg04456.html
2007-05-21 00:46:02 · answer #2 · answered by John W 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If they do have them, then we had better be damn sure we have proof. You can see the results of bad intelligence. With the current administration just your question may be enough for them to declare war. It is a mess over there, maybe we should be clear about our domestic threats and leave the WMD to Syria. Iran has already shown they want the nuclear power option. Iran is talking and telling US what they are planning. It seems to me that if they did have the power to use WMD they would show their card with Palestine right now. I think you are wrong.
2007-05-20 21:38:45 · answer #3 · answered by Pablo 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, that is probably the answer - they sold them all in one big clearance sale right before the war started - and right under the noses of all the UN inspectors and satellites that were constantly monitoring Iraq leading up to the war!!! It definately couldn't be that Iraq actually stopped making them. I am sure it had nothing to do with a push for intel that would justify the current administrations desire to go into Iraq. No, no, no, it couldn't be that people inflated intel to match the administrations policies. After all that has never happened before... (Vietnam, Bay of Pigs, overthrow of a democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran in 1953 in order to open up access to their vast supply of oil). After all, it if were true that the intel was inflated - then that would mean that all the intel assertions were proven incorrect after we invaded. OH THATS RIGHT, they WERE all DISPROVEN.
2007-05-20 21:41:24 · answer #4 · answered by Christopher B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you have a question or are you going to keep spouting out the Rush Limbaugh rhetoric crap?
There were no weapons found. There was no evidence of weapons found. No solid evidence of WMD's was ever presented.
2007-05-20 22:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who doesn't is more the question, as even the Libs think they were moved there.
Yes I know three or four will say there were never any in Iraq and those three or four
live in caves,
are blind, and
Can't Understand Normal Thinking
2007-05-20 21:43:00 · answer #6 · answered by BUILD THE WALL 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Syria...all his planes were flown to Iran during the first Gulf War because they were too chicken s*it
2007-05-20 21:31:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Syria. It's obvious Saddam had them, he used them to gas the Kurds'!
2007-05-20 21:56:06 · answer #8 · answered by Bunz 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey, everybody, listen...Saddam shipped them all to me by FedEx a couple a weeks before the invasion. i haven't told anyone up to now because i was thinking of using them myself, but the gas has started to leak and i'm running out of filters for my masks...
2007-05-20 21:31:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Aren't they under the desk in the Oval Office?
2007-05-20 21:32:04 · answer #10 · answered by ninaol 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
GET SYRIA AND IRAN!!!!
...hey wait a minute......this seems so familiar.
2007-05-20 22:05:15 · answer #11 · answered by it's National Security 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋