English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-20 14:02:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

That is probably one of the kinder adjectives I would assign to him.

2007-05-20 15:13:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That is more true than 1+1= 2

2007-05-20 21:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

No. Whah! The truth hurts, doesn't it?

"I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history."

2007-05-20 21:15:36 · answer #3 · answered by mattzcoz 5 · 0 2

He was irrelevant when he was President - and even more so now, if that's possible.

2007-05-20 21:24:14 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 1

Since the moment his term in office ended. Yes.

2007-05-20 21:10:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Is! He gave away the Panama canal!!

2007-05-20 21:11:33 · answer #6 · answered by and socialism 4 · 2 0

He wasn't hardly relevant during his term in office. Why should he be now?

2007-05-20 21:09:57 · answer #7 · answered by doctdon 7 · 1 1

Let's put it this way----------when he was in office nobody ever paid any attention to what he had to say-------but then when he starts spewing his commie liberal sewage--------NOW--------- lets get his opinion-------------well what do you think Jimmy?

2007-05-20 21:14:14 · answer #8 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 2 1

NO.

He has proven to be one of the best Presidents in history.

2007-05-20 21:11:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

At least.

2007-05-20 21:09:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

fedest.com, questions and answers