Because Windows has so much of the market share. It doesn't make much sense to attack an Operating System that has less then 10% of the users. The virus writers are looking for fame and to do that you have to hit where it counts.
Now, that's not to say there aren't Mac viruses, because there are. However, they only number in the dozens and don't have the user base to spread like wildfire like in the Windows world.
2007-05-20 08:57:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by fringefire 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Macs CAN get viruses. IThere is not a technical reason why macs dont get as many viruses writen, it is a SOCIAL reason. The reason why there are not as many is because everybody wants to be the one who "took down microsoft" and noone wants to be the "JERK that took down apple". Sort of a David and goliath issue. Same with Firefox and IE. Another reason is that if youre goal is to cause disruption, why disrupt the group that is LESS than a fifth the size
2007-05-20 08:57:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Harrison H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mac's can get viruses, but it is much more common to get viruses on a windows computer. This is because many more people uses windows computers so hackers made viruses for windows computers not macs or linux computes
2007-05-20 08:55:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would expect that one of the reason is because 98% of people use Windows, and hackers creating viruses want it to spread as much as possible. Macs wouldn't have the same success, also because its programs are much less used than windows-formatted ones. I have a mac and it is (knock on wood) truly harder to catch a virus. Hope it helps.
2007-05-20 08:56:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm a Mac person, and sorry, i don't have a clue in the adventure that they're going to artwork on a Mac (lol). yet, probably no longer as no longer very many video games artwork on Macs - or are attainable for Mac OS X. i'd advise a Mac because i imagine that's way less demanding to apply - all of your shortcuts to the programmes are on the dock on the bottom of the exhibit screen so that you do not ought to pass by vast stupid menus attempting to locate something. you may positioned residing house windows onto a Mac utilising the programme stated as "Parallels computers" - it expenses round £50/£60, yet you'll ought to purchase yet another reproduction of residing house windows XP/Vista and so on for it to artwork. no longer attempting to be ageist, yet when you're mother and father are previous - except they are very technical, i do not imagine that they'd recognize how all of it works because this is form of complicated. Linux - nicely, infrequently any video games are attainable for that. i'd say keep on with residing house windows XP - and perchance a clean workstation? because residing house windows Vista seems far too tricky to apply - even for me lol, and, an same is going for residing house windows 7. Macs are really effortless to apply and boot up interior of a minute, although the video games probably gained't artwork. you'll get video games for Mac from shops and the Apple save & Apple save internet web site, yet they are restricted. effortless, i'd say get a clean pc/workstation on residing house windows XP. I spose residing house windows 7 is nice, yet, i imagine residing house windows XP is astounding.
2016-10-18 09:08:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mac and all can of OS can get virus but, PC is more know for getting them. Apple once put a worm on the OS disc and then realize it then it took a long time to fix it.
2007-05-20 09:09:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sheer numbers. Macs arent more secure. It just seems the bad guys like windows.
2007-05-20 08:55:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by James J 3
·
0⤊
0⤋