yes buddy, Anything is possible in Game of Cricket.
even team india...~~
2007-05-20 08:43:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The correct fact is other way around, i.e. rain saved Bangladesh from another humiliating defeat as having posted 384 runs for the loss of 6 wickets, India would not hnave nost the match under any circumstances and they had every chance to win the match if the rain did not interrupt the play.
2007-05-20 13:30:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bangladesh had no chance or whatsoever of wining the game, going with 3 spinners against a team that plays spin so well. Remember the way Dhoni and Karthik exposed their spin attack in the first ODI. Also, Bashar sets defensive fields, that works only for ODIs. In test matches, the fielding side will have to innovate. Bashar's captaincy lacks imagination.
2007-05-20 08:47:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by maddy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you should not use your head but rely on the news paper reports and TV channels. How in the world you think that India was going to lose the match after scoring these many runs in the first innings you Einstein?
2007-05-20 12:12:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it particularly is the 2d time rain is saving India. First became in the Natwest try whilst England became basically one wicket removed from victory. Australia performed tremendously nicely and that they might honestly have won simply by fact India lost one wicket and the 1st over by way of Brett Lee became a maiden. i think of rain disadvantaged Australia of a nicely deserved victory.
2016-12-29 15:46:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the first defeat was a fluke and i think that india has got its act together now and will put up respectable showings starting now.
2007-05-20 15:40:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by answerman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no way...i think it destroyed india ..........they wud hav won......they played so well in the the odis......rain prevented them frm a defeatin bang...
2007-05-20 21:25:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2007-05-20 19:29:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no.
2007-05-22 02:07:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by lost... 5
·
0⤊
0⤋