2007-05-20 08:22:40 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He did in the last debate!and made Rudy look like a fool!
2007-05-20 08:23:51 · update #1
Ron Paul is a good man and better than the rest of them.
That is not to say much, because anyone could be better than them.
Corporate America can not allow Ron Paul to make any significant headway, so the corporate media will ignore him and wont let him take the spotlight.
I like the man, however, there is something unreal in Ron Paul's economics which I instinctively reject, if he had any chance of becoming president, I would spend more time on that subject. (for myself. :-))
id:jpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjpjp
2007-05-22 15:46:13 · answer #1 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Congressman Ron Paul is the greater suited selection. Governor Mitt Romney's positions exchange like the climate; he had 4 sanctuary cities in Massachusetts.. now he claims to be against amnesty for unlawful immigrants, he's for increasing the size of the federal government (he's positioned forth a wellness care plan corresponding to Hillary-care) & he will sink the U. S. further into debt by utilising investment the conflict in Iraq. Congressman Ron Paul’s remote places coverage isn't “working” from Iraq, he’s for a phased redeployment. Don’t overlook our generals have reported that Al Qaeda has been defeated on an economic and strategic point.. even president Bush has reported he plans to withdraw attempt against troops in another country by utilising the tip of this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. besides how many greater lives, years & billions of dollars greater could be spent in Iraq? Our economic equipment is in unfavourable condition we can not have the money for to stay in Iraq.
2016-11-25 19:15:15 · answer #2 · answered by quartermon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Paul performed all that well in the last debate. I know it's difficult to fit a full foreign policy agenda into a debate soundbite, but I think he was less than eloquent in voicing his non-interventionist approach, and I was embarrassed because I felt he DID make it sound like he thought America was to blame. I still support him because I know that isn't his position, but he'll have to perform a lot better than that if he wants to gain traction. When Fred Thompson and Newt Gingrich get into the race, Ron Paul is going to have to step his debating skills up a notch. Giuliani is an easy target. The big battles are yet to come.
2007-05-21 01:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by skip742 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul has a tough road ahead of him. He is not popular with any of te media. His views and ideas do not fit with either left or right extreem nor do they fit the platform of the major parties.
Ron Paul is a great believer in the constitution as it is written. He does feel that many current laws absolutely violate the bill of rights and would want to push to have those laws abolished because of it. This is in direct opposition of the parties that got the laws passed in the first place.
Even though I agree with his stance and would consider supporting him in the general election, I doubt that he will have the cash to put up an effective campaign.
2007-05-20 08:31:19 · answer #4 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
He already has. And because he won in the polls in both Republican debates, the media has gone out of their way to ignore and censor Ron Paul. My Space suspends accounts of Ron Paul supporters, MSNBC and Yahoo News have initially left Ron Paul out of the candidate listings, and even YA has suspended accounts (including mine). I have been a longtime user of YA and my account was recently suspended with no reason stated. And all I did recently was ask one or two questions about Ron Paul! Coincidence?
2007-05-20 08:29:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
yes ....yes he will!
That's who! FoxNews and all the other media sources have been stiffing Ron Paul because he's a CLEAN Candidate. That means he recieves no campaign contributions from special interest groups like oil companies etc. It is time for a change!
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
2007-05-20 08:37:48 · answer #6 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I like Ron Paul, I like his record of house votes in both terms and his ideas. But he did not orate well AND made Rudy look like a presidential candidate. You are, in fact, sadly mistaken.
2007-05-20 08:33:27 · answer #7 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whos Ron Paul?
2007-05-20 08:35:08 · answer #8 · answered by underdog 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
When Giuliani responded in a knee jerk way to his comments on Iraq with "9/11" I knew right away that Rudy cannot be a good President. If he is still connecting Iraq and 9/11..... No way.
2007-05-20 08:27:35 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
1. Rudy made Paul look like a fool
2. Paul won't be asked to participate in the next debate.
3. How is Mitt Romney evil? State your case.
4. Paul got into the wrong debate....he's more like the
Democrats (pro=enemy; blame America first)
2007-05-20 08:29:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋