English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Steve Nash is there B****ing about game five of the semi finals against the spurs because his boyfriend Amare did not play.
He is trying to blame thier elimination on that fact while there were so many other factors. First of all Horry fouled Nash yes but it was totally over draumatized. It hardly warranted a two game suspension ( I have seen so much worse). This is the NBA finals for peace sake I look forward to seeing the hard fouls.
Was I the only one who was watching game 5 seeing the spurs get whipped until the ending of the 4 th quarter. The spurs were down by atleast 12 points. The Suns completely dominated the game until there were like 3 minutes left. They definately could have won that game.
Last time I checked one needs to win 4 games out of 7 to move forward in the conference, so what happened to the other 3 games that they lost. I am not really a spurs fan, I just hate whinners.
Nash just needs to accept the fact that the spurs were the better team.

2007-05-20 06:53:56 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Basketball

15 answers

summary please

2007-05-20 06:59:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Question is why are you such a sore winner?

Is it because Amare expose you guys?

As far as game 5, if you play 6 guys they get
tired and give up baskets at the end of the
game. Not that you know much about basketball.

If you think the game 5 win where you had
Amare off the floor is a real win then don't
bring this up again. Maybe him saying what
everyone knows in the league about Bowen
hurts, but hey Stu Jackson alreay had private
talks with San Antonio and Bowen about
not being dirty mid season.

But Congrats to Spurs, on winning. Most people
know Magic and Lakers won with great basketball,
and Bird and Celtics won by undercuting, grabbing
and playing dirty. So maybe thats why SPURs don't
have any fans outside of SA.

No matter next year Suns have 3 first round picks.
Lakers will still suck, and we'llsee you next year in the
conference finals. Just make sure to be able to
handle good basketball, because dirty play did
not work for the celtics, as Lakers proved in
the 80s.

Be proud to be the Pistons of the West for now.

2007-05-20 07:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Spurs have always dominated the Suns in the tim duncan era before the series the spurs were 14-5 against the suns and before there was no talk of this "dirty team". Its only because the Suns wanted to go to the NBA finals for the first time and knew that if they won this series they could advance easy.

Calling the spurs a dirty team is like calling peyton manning and tony dungy unsportsman like cheaters.

2007-05-20 07:28:08 · answer #3 · answered by Cowboy87 5 · 0 0

The series is over so get off of it. It's time for the conference finals so shut up and let's enjoy the rest of the playoffs.

Edit
To the guy below me that said the Suns wanted to go to the Finals for the first time. Just to let you know the Suns have been to 2 NBA Finals. The were in the 1976 Finals against the Celtics and lost 4-2 and in the 1993 Finals against the Bulls and lost 4-2. So get your facts straight.

2007-05-20 07:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I got to say although I knew the Spurs were going to win this series regardless I kind of think it was unfair Amare was suspended for game 5. But rules are rules and the rules state that if you leave the bench during a fight you get an automatic 1 game suspension. The reality is the Suns have got to become a lot more tough mentally, emotionally, and physically in the playoffs. If they don't then they'll never win a championship.

2007-05-20 07:08:01 · answer #5 · answered by roni26 4 · 2 0

You are right Mr. question asker. fact that suns had spurs down in #5 and lost anyway and cry "if we had studewhiner we would have won this series" prove exactly what kind of team suns are. they had their man in #1, #2 #3 #4 and #6 in which he put up 38 points AND STILL LOST! this is going in the history books, along with those 2 finals losses that "phx_suns_32_05" mentioned, and every other loss that the suns suffered at the hands of the San Antonio Spurs! GO SPURS GO!!!

2007-05-21 06:52:10 · answer #6 · answered by tjklmwjr 1 · 0 0

let me just give you some advice.

SHUT UP.

the spurs knew that the only way that they could beat the suns was that if some of their star players were suspended or injured. that's what they tried to do to nash.

2007-05-20 07:54:56 · answer #7 · answered by angelbutt29 3 · 1 1

Shut up. This question is as tired and boring as the Spurs.

2007-05-20 08:33:50 · answer #8 · answered by Tomo718 3 · 1 0

your right steve nash is. Spurs won people so get it and know your facts. By the way nice question.

PS Screw you spurs haters

2007-05-20 07:27:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

the entire suns team moved on. i don't know what you are talking about.

2007-05-20 10:14:51 · answer #10 · answered by Einstein 5 · 0 0

its because the only way the spurs can win is if they get a cheapshot on nash. Amare went to defend his teamate and got ****** off. It's such bullshit about the suspension, he shouldv'e played and they would've killed th spurs.

2007-05-20 07:16:32 · answer #11 · answered by jim r 1 · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers