In my opinion, he should go because if he did, he would probably have more security and support than the poor bloke that they'll now have to send instead of him!
what does everyone else think?
2007-05-20 06:26:36 · 12 answers · asked by Daisybelle 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The thing is if he went he would endanger everyone who served with him. With that much security for one soldier it would interfere with doing the job at hand.
2007-05-20 06:34:02 · answer #1 · answered by Behaviorist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The most fair thing Britain should do is withdraw its troops from Iraq. It is hard to decide if Prince Harry should have been sent to Iraq, as he wanted. But obviously his life is more important then a picture of Tonyca Blairisky together with G.W. Bullshit.
2007-05-20 14:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What poor bloke.Men and women join the army of thier free will and sign an agreement to serve queen and country and if that means fighting a war so be it.None of the soldiers whinge about it.As for harry it was a matter of security.
2007-05-20 13:38:44 · answer #3 · answered by georgie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, given all he's been through---truly with loss of his extraordinary mother whom I adored----I think WHOMEVER should do WHATEVER to protect him. **********************
You are right about the extra security----
But haven't the kids REALLY been through enough?????
They seem to be on the right track---despite all the HORRIBLE things they been through. Camilla. Mum. NO MUM. Camilla!!!
The Queen for grandma----??? OUCH!!!
Personally I don't think Charles has the ability to really love like Diana did. Those kids must so desperately miss their mom. It shouldn't be the "The Kennedy Curse"----
That's just MY opinion----but I am a mother and a teacher....I can't fathom THEIR lives without her. :) I cannot.
2007-05-20 13:43:23 · answer #4 · answered by luvbooksswak 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
UK announced the new prime minister, taking over for Blair, is going to pull out from Iraq so it doesn't matter.
=
2007-05-20 13:32:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Life is not fair...PERIOD.
Once you come to that realization, things clear up a bit, and you begin to see what is possible in change, and what is part of the human condition that will NEVER change.
: )
2007-05-20 13:33:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would be a high profile target for insurgents. Thus putting everyone around him at higher risk.
2007-05-20 13:36:39 · answer #7 · answered by cdever5 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would have been a possibility that he would have been captured. Think about the consequences of that.
2007-05-20 14:01:16 · answer #8 · answered by sister_godzilla 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its like the old saying money talks bullshit walks yes he said he go over there but of course not to fight oh daddies son oooh no ,you cant put him out there to get shot at.
2007-05-20 17:42:53 · answer #9 · answered by carin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if "fair" has anything to do with it. It is what it is. His military superiors said he can't go.
2007-05-20 14:33:06 · answer #10 · answered by GABY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋