To many candidates and too few ideas.
2007-05-20 02:18:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see what difference it makes how many there are now. By November '08 there will be only 2 major candidates.
2007-05-20 09:02:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Delray 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Given the overall quality of what we have so far, I'd definitely say "too few".
I suspect we're going to get to November '08 and once again be asking ourselves "Is that the best we can do?"
Well, if you keep playing the "lesser of two evils game", then yes, that is the best you can do, and always will be.
2007-05-20 09:03:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by open4one 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Too many that have no business running and, too few that are actually viable candidates.
2007-05-20 09:15:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by SlickWillie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do like me, weed out the ones who have the largest campaign funds(signs of being in debt to corporate interests)
Vote for Dennis Kucinich, or Ron Paul.
2007-05-20 09:07:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Does it make any difference? Soon as a Democrat REALLY is elected by the voters, the Republicans just call the movers and send their belongings to "Pennsylvania Ave."
Remember that is what "Dubya" did, or however you spell his nick name!!
2007-05-20 09:06:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you and I will probably never run for President
why? something to do with $$$$
I am sure the United State was not created by just the 1% rich folks = Paris Hilton and Bush
2007-05-20 09:03:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr. USA U 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Osama Bin Laden
George bk bush
Hillary clinton
Chen shui bian
2007-05-20 09:53:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by jeffrey b 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A good number right now, need more parties. Only having two choices at crunch time is not enough.
2007-05-20 09:19:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would like to see more candidates.
2007-05-20 09:03:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋