2007-05-19 23:18:17 · 7 answers · asked by suraj r 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Cats, apparently. Along with Henry III of France and other great ailurophobes in history.
2007-05-19 23:48:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Alexander became a great chief and became undefeated. Napoleon did have a number of subordinates, yet he additionally defeated plenty greater beneficial armies than Alexander. it is an extremely annoying question and you will make logical arguments for the two adult men. individually, i'm a proponent of Napoleon. He chop up is military into semi-self preserving communities, led by utilising adult men he chosen consistent with advantage no longer delivery and became a grasp at utilising the terrain to his benefit (see Austerlitz). There are additionally a number of different selections to think approximately (however I believe you that those are the genuine 2). Genghis Khan, Gustavus Adolphus, and Frederick the excellent additionally deserve some degree of acceptance.
2016-11-25 02:53:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it was Bernadotte, who was proscribed by Napoleon in 1809, left for Sweden (with Napoleon's will) to become king in 1810, and then fought with Wellington and Blucher at Waterloo in 1815.
2007-05-20 00:25:41 · answer #3 · answered by Lolo 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If I was Napoleon, I would have been scared to death of A Russian Offensive.
Lol.. I think I'm the only one serious?
2007-05-19 23:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by Ian N 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tall women, coz he was a such a shorty little fella : P
2007-05-19 23:28:27 · answer #5 · answered by Shienaran 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mice.
2007-05-19 23:25:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
his shadow?? no he was afraid that he would not be ruler!!!
2007-05-19 23:22:15 · answer #7 · answered by sweetness #1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋