You are being confronted by the worst sort of terrorist and anti American group of thugs that want nothing more than to put you into the ground.
Who would you choose and why?
2007-05-19 23:08:24 · 15 answers · asked by Jack L. W. 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey kalo read the question, don't rant about Bush.
2007-05-20 00:52:05 · update #1
Bush or Reagan. Both are strong and won't fear making someone angry by coming to my defense.
2007-05-19 23:17:18 · answer #1 · answered by mamadixie 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I would want Clinton in office. Bush puts on a big show and accomplishes nothing. He reminds me of the wrestlers on tv....ranting and raving threats and stomping around and nothing. All Bush is doing is getting people killed. He is not an effective president and he refuses to take accountability for his actions. 9/11 happened on his watch not Clinton's. Bush has turned the USA into the most hated nation since Nazi Germany. The world has no sympathy for us now and all the innocents dying in Iraq have made far more terrorists than ever before. The man cannot be trusted. He lies to the people. And yes I read the question and if i were in a situation with terrorist all around and I needed protection, I sure don't think Bush would be effective at it.
I sure don't want Bush watching my back....I would be afraid he would stab it.
2007-05-20 06:30:55 · answer #2 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Theodore Roosevelt.
2007-05-20 06:25:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We all ready are there we all just don't know it yet. One man no matter who it is isn't enough. We need to have a United country, we faced far worse circumstances during ww2 then we have now the difference was we were united as a country. Now because of a party that has been taken over by far left liberals we are more divided then we have ever been. United we can't be beat divided we can't win.
2007-05-20 06:24:20 · answer #4 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not Jimmy Carter...he would immediately try to appease them. Not Clinton ...he "detested the military" and was a coward draft dodger who would be useless in a fight.
I go with either of the Bushs' just based on their record of killing these Mo Fo's
2007-05-20 06:21:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not a 60 year old fat guy. That's for sure.
But if I have to pick a President I'd take Teddy Roosevelt.
Of the living Presidents...Clinton.
2007-05-20 06:13:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Roosevelt, he has a recognizable face and who ever was messing with me would freak out and run from fear of the dead president eating their brains. And it would be a long time before they mess with me and the dead guy again.
2007-05-20 06:20:00 · answer #7 · answered by babycattos 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush, Giuliani, McCain.
??There were tons of terrorist attacks on US interests while Clinton was in office.
2007-05-20 06:23:41 · answer #8 · answered by tttplttttt 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Big Bush
2007-05-20 06:13:24 · answer #9 · answered by Ex Head 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
i would like to Choose Musharaf, Bcoz he Understands the Fighting Rulz as a General, He knows American and Internatinal media and Aly,s conpiracis through his expreince and his power to convince other.i can,nt choose Ahmedi nejad bcoz he don,t speak English.when a man can,nt speak english how can he convince other face to face.but i,m not denying his potatiol.i can,nt choose Abdullah bcoz he have no mind to rule the most sacred place for Muslim as a leader.ETC
2007-05-20 06:16:14 · answer #10 · answered by Adnan 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hmm...
either
Kennedy or Abraham Lincoln
They actually had Commen Scence
and spoke properly..(to tired to spell right lol)
2007-05-20 06:13:06 · answer #11 · answered by pez388 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋