English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

lets just say, for arguments sake, that Osama Bin Laden could actually vote on who the next president of the United States would be....

Which political party do you think he would vote for? And what does that SAY about that party?

Would he vote Republican? Why or why not.....?
think about it....

2007-05-19 15:49:16 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

23 answers

Any Democrat because he knows he could run free to do what ever he wants in the world. If he was to do something in the USA he could count on the ACLU to defend him.

2007-05-19 15:57:10 · answer #1 · answered by Flyflinger 5 · 5 4

Hello. Good thought provoking question... well I would have to say he would follow along with the elite of this country, and since the 2 party system was created to keep "we the people" divided and we currently have a Republican president, he would most definitely vote Democrat. Unfortunately "the public" hasn't yet caught onto the fact that party does not matter all but a few politicians suck regardless of party affiliation.

2007-05-19 18:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by laidbackguy1972 1 · 1 0

Osama Bin Laden will vote for Barack Obama because he is a Muslim and could negotiate on what to do about terrorism in America.

Definitely, he will not vote for a Republican because its party is predominantly against terrorism.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.

2007-05-19 21:21:38 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3 0

stable one. An self sustaining Or whichever you may actually keep the battling going. There are those that have an interest by conflict and dying, then there are those that desire peace. because of the fact the media has bought us bin-weighted down as a mad terrorist, bought us hussein as hitler and is now merchandising us the conflict of worry, we are able to purchase the recent four wheel stress suv that is going 0-60 in 7.8 secs. that's suggested the Nero performed a multitude around as Rome burned, we elect a clean fiddler to maintain us entertained.

2017-01-10 09:34:47 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What makes you think he didn't vote in our last election? We can't seem to locate a guy 6'6" in a land of 5'7' men, maybe he is hiding in plain sight right here in the US of A. Since Iraq was dancing in the streets at the swing of the balance of power going to the Democrats, I would say that is your answer. I think we blew it. They were way too happy about the outcome.

2007-05-19 16:02:07 · answer #5 · answered by One Wing Eagle Woman 6 · 2 0

He will vote for whoever he thinks will keep troops in Iraq and the Middle East the longest, so he has more time to kill more of them, and more reason to attract more followers. That means Republicans.

Face it, if the US were to suddenly leave the Middle East, pull out all of our troops in ANY Muslim-controlled country, and cut off all ties to any of them, OBL would have nothing to complain about, no rallying cry for his followers.

We need to sit on the sidelines and be a beacon of hope to light a fire in the minds of the people living under oppression so that they will rise against their oppressors. We should not be fighting those wars for them.

Remember the words of Thomas Paine: "What we obtain, too cheap, we esteem too lightly:--'Tis dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to set a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed, if so celestial an article as Freedom should not be highly rated."

The problem with Iraq is that the people are being HANDED democracy. They don't want it, they didn't fight for it, they don't know what to do with it. They don't have a Washington or a Jefferson or an Adams to lead them, and they didn't want freedom badly enough to rise up against Saddam themselves. The country is 80% Shiite, but the Sunnis controlled it for 30 years. They never pledged 'our lives, our homes, our sacred honor.' And until they do, they'll never be free.

And for those of you who are saying that he would vote Democrat because they would let him run free, George has had five years to catch the guy, so maybe you should look some other direction. I have to belive that if Bush wanted him captured, he'd be captured by now. Bush is letting him run free because OBL generates the fear that the Bush administration thrives upon. They think the more we fear, the more secure the Replicans are in their power.

2007-05-19 16:33:12 · answer #6 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1 4

I would imagine he'd vote for someone intelligent enough to actually comprehend that our foreign policy of meddling with other countries affairs for the last 60 years has incited rage around the world.

Unfortunately, I don't believe such a person is electable in a country so easily opiated by nationalistic sound bites.

Instead, everyone thinks we're hated because other countries are jealous. I'm sure that's a small part in some cases, but Osama Bin Laden was one of our allies at one point. He didn't suddenly crack and decide he hates us because we let women wear pants; he has long stated (as documented in the 9/11 Commission Report) explicitly that it's our practice of stationing troops in Saudi Arabia, bombing and starving Iraq, and generally meddling in the afairs of the Middle East that's caused him to call for a fatwah.

You might decide our meddling is warranted; you may think fixing other countries problems are worth sacrificing other American's lives, and you may think Iraq deserved it. That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. However, if you say that our foreign policy doesn't create enemies, you're doing a disservice to yourself and to your country.

2007-05-19 16:06:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

He would likely vote for anyone who promised to pull out of Iraq. That would make his day, along with all those good little terrorists who monitor Fox and CNN on a daily basis.

2007-05-19 15:53:09 · answer #8 · answered by George C 4 · 4 1

It would depend on his motives.

if he was just on a power trip and wanted to increase his power and keep the war on terror going, he'd vote for any of the 9 pro war republicans (probably with double emphasis's on Romney for his double Gitmo comment) and most of the Democrats [they really have not distinguished themselves beyond wanting to stay in the Middle East]

If he was only after what he stated (US out of Middle East Affairs) I be live his choices would be Ron Paul and Gavel.

Just because the head nut job wants something, doesn't necessarily make it NOT the right thing for our government to do.

2007-05-19 15:56:43 · answer #9 · answered by Ethaniel 2 · 0 4

He would vote Democrat, probably Obama. The only Republican he might vote for is Paul.

2007-05-19 15:52:37 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 8 2

He'd vote Democrat obviously.
But does that really matter?
It's not because the Dems are terror-loving, America hating people. It's because it's to his advantage.
Do the Republicans want to pull out of Iraq?
Do the Dems start wars all over the place and try to govern the middle-east?
Are the Dems (too) strict on taking freedoms away to stop terrorism?

2007-05-19 15:55:11 · answer #11 · answered by kass9191 3 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers