None of my civil liberties were ever impeded by the war on terror. But then again, I'm not doing illegal activities. You forget that the red scare was great for the economy. If it has the same effect, which is should. It should help keep the US the leading nation in the free world. It has the opposite effect of "strapping ourselves".
2007-05-19 15:52:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The point is that "No longer are we leading the free world" people don't want to be lead, by America they want to govern themselves.
Can we question the reason we are being attacked?
To be blunt, people although it looks like they like America, don't like the people. Some Americans think that they are God's gift to the world...and that pisses people off. Americans go into a country and think that everyone will bow down to them and that's just not true.
Some Americans don't respect other people's culture calling them primitive and backward and they think that their opinions are correct and everyone else wrong.
And that is some reasons why the US is being attacked
2007-05-23 10:04:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by pheonix_down482002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is NEVER wrong to have US support the War on Terror. But it is immoral and insane for those who used nations as scapegoats just to show off our might and pretend that we are really fighting terror, and as a result give reason for terrorists to mushroom out of otherwise decent common folks. Terrorists in Iraq were scared having their heads chopped off by Saddam. They remained passive in Iraq or ran away from Iraq. Our occupation of Irag allowed them to become active, with many re-entering Iraq to chop off our Americans' heads! Yep, Bush and the NeoCons were right. we gave them freedom in Iraq to keep killing our Troops! Without Iraqi insiders, how do they know where our Troops, etc. were moving? How did they enter the most secured areas of the Green Zone? We are probably training those that are killing our people! And that is the most costly price we have to pay!
2007-05-19 17:24:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by United_Peace 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Adolph Hitler said the way to control a people is to plant fear within the populace. The Bush administration and its 'crack' Department of Homeland Security has created awareness of the "danger"; has planted the fear in many Americans; and has started its own terrorism tactics to take over the country.
Benjamin Franklin once said: "When people fear the government, it is tyranny. When the government fears the people, it is liberty."
One of the costs of freedom is living in a country where we, at times, might find ourselves in danger. The government cannot protect us from everything; any government that tries is more than likely trying to protect itself. The last organization any American citizen should trust is its federal government; it has lied to us far too many times. -RKO- 05/19/07
2007-05-19 16:17:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your username is quite suitable thinking your "question" Is it precise that we are purely getting a $six hundred rebate while the conflict is costing lots? that's as precise that we are purely getting a $six hundred rebate while welfare is costing us lots. that's as precise as us purely getting a $six hundred rebate while nutrients stamps are costing lots. additionally, do you even comprehend what the rebate be conscious potential? It potential which you paid up front. The decrease earnings human beings paid lots much less in taxes then the top earnings human beings, therefor, they deserve much less. in case you have chose to speak a pair of genuine injustice, why no longer point out that the those that have an AGI over $75K gets no longer something back. With an adjusted gross earnings of around $75,000 you're paying around $22,000 a year in taxes. For that privilege, you get a reimbursement of 0, no longer something, nada, zip. Make purely $40,000, and you get the entire $six hundred. Please clarify to me, take as long as you elect, the way it quite is trustworthy?
2017-01-10 09:34:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What would the world do if the United States withdrew into isolationism. History has much to say about this. True, U.S. foreign policy is far from perfect, but consider the alternatives. Adolf Hitler was one of them. Sadly, the only thing we really learn from history though, is that we don't learn anything from history.
2007-05-19 17:01:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by birdog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Less than the cost to clean up New York City from the effects of a dirty nuke blast.
2007-05-19 18:12:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
朱门酒肉臭,路有冻死骨: Inside the red gate, wine and meat rot; on the road, there are people frozen to death. / The uneven distribution of wealth in the society.
2007-05-19 19:54:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by gary L 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I absolutely agree with you. Everything you said is exactly how I feel also.
At this point we can only make our voices heard by voting and by argument and furious debate on this fiasco.
2007-05-19 17:20:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yawn! oh sorry, was there a legitimate question there, or just a rant?
2007-05-19 15:57:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by whiteman 5
·
0⤊
1⤋