It's still a planet through my eyes =)
I don't think size should matter.
2007-05-19 15:11:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Banana Hero [sic] 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Strongly Disagree
2007-05-19 22:11:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by SPORTS GUY 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yo js!
Asteroids orbit a star and almost all of them rotate.
Comets orbit a star and they rotate.
NOW how many planets do we have, according to your highly knowledgeable and well considered "definition"?
Oh, and BTW, Mercury orbits a star, and its rotation is once per mercurian year, exactly as our moon orbits the earth with a rotation rate of exactly once per revolution. IOW, they are both "tidally locked" to their hosts. Is their motion true rotation?
And one last thing: "they" didn't redefine "planet" just for publicity. The redefinition was done to facilitate communication among scientists.
I guess its a real pity that they didn't check with you and the other posters here to see if your casual and traditional beliefs should be considered.
.
2007-05-20 07:24:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pluto is no longer a planet,and I do agree with it.Even astronomer's make mistakes.
2007-05-20 08:18:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Candi Apples 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they just want publicity. There's nothing wrong with the classic definition of a planet.
planet: orbits a star and rotates.
2007-05-19 22:17:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by wisemancumth 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually it never was a planet; it's more like a moon of the sun.
2007-05-19 22:11:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by supertop 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Highly disagree.
2007-05-19 22:10:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Holy Macaroni! 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yea, I like Pluto...spent to much time learning about it to have it all taken away!
2007-05-19 22:13:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cyber Stalker III 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're right, it is a planet. I went to school for a reason.
2007-05-19 22:11:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by T-Vol 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a drawf planet
2007-05-19 22:15:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋