English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Forget that it cost ur favorite team one game and actualy think about the ramifications of reapealing it. Look back at what hapened to Rudy Tomjonavick. Remember that when a player leaves the bench during a fight it creates chaos on the court and the players on the court during a fight would potentialy see every one as a threat. Look at the fact that every year since this rule started it has decreased the number of players that get suspended by it so in effect could obliterate itself. I could garauntee that the nuber of players that do it now will be greatly reduced by this recent incident. I don't wanna hear about this recent one either or how unfair it was. And u can't determine intent of someone running onto the court it cant be judged what someone is thinking when they run onto the court.

2007-05-19 09:02:35 · 5 answers · asked by kyle M 2 in Sports Basketball

5 answers

The rule is their to prevent like the Pistons and Pacers when it all falls out. It make sense if you got only 10 guys on the court fighting it is lesser to break up than 20 guys and more than that. It is fair because no matter what intentions that person on the bench will do but at least the rule is trying to protect the players from getting hurt in a fight and plus they are grown men they should know how to conduct in public. They get paid millions of dollars to play a game and in public view they should act like a man not a bum from the street. Somethings do happen in game if they dont like it just save it after the game dont punish the whole team because of how you feel thats being greedy. Just play the game and do that thing someplace else.

2007-05-19 09:18:19 · answer #1 · answered by mz 2 · 2 0

Then why leave the bench in any respect in case you could not mediate, help, or excacerbate the area? The puppies are saved in line, while they're coached precise, how many gamers have been suspended in long island for leaving the bench throughout their combat with the Nuggets? I promise this rule won't be replaced interior the offseason, and no proprietor, even Phoenix's proprietor, will ask to or vote for it to get replaced. You all are blaming the incorrect human beings for the incorrect ingredient! Stoudemire and Diaw knew the guideline, and in the event that they did no longer then the Phoenix training team could be fired, yet they left the bench, Stoudemire became needless to say going after Horry by utilising the way he would not even plenty as look at Nash. the place the NBA screwed up is permitting the Spurs to mug and coffee priced shot the Suns for the 1st 5 video games of that sequence. BLAME the main suitable human beings FOR the main suitable ingredient!!!!!!! 'reason i'm sick or having to anser this question, quickly i'm gonna initiate doing what I did with the Kobe vs. whomever questions.

2016-11-25 01:08:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is a great rule. The more players you can keep off the floor during a brawl, the better. There are policemen standing right near, but an NBA player can beat up a policeman before he can even get a hand on his taser.

2007-05-19 09:42:30 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin P 3 · 0 0

Yes. Remember the Palace brawl?

2007-05-19 09:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by Alice K 7 · 1 0

rule is a rule... i think it helped to check any potentially violent situation before... it will do good in the future as well...

2007-05-19 09:50:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers