Do you think he weighed all the possiabilities and decider-ed to Attack Islam.
2007-05-19 08:47:12 · 12 answers · asked by ShortBus43 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What? ....and missed out an imperial project in the Middle of EasT???? This was our project, ...our grand strategy. We wanted to transform the region..(and force democracy down their throat)
This was meant to be a generational commitment ...(and it has become one)
We, the neocons, justify this Boldness as manifest destiny...We are on a moral mission, sir!
By the way, I will have a hard time on Monday-you know the no confidence vote and all that- so say a little prayer for me!!
Thanks
G
2007-05-19 09:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love to see GB do the right thing for a change. Even if OB and all of Al Quad higher up planners and fighters were caught and hopefully killed, I doubt the violence from terrorists would stop. They are hard liners and they are brainwashed into thinking that everyone but them are infidels. If their mission is to kill infidels, capturing and killing OBL and Al Queda higher ups won't solve a damn thing. They are truly mentally ill and they are KILLERS.
No, I don't think GWB though much about going to war - if he did there would be a clear plan for winning the war and there would be a "plan B" in case plan A failed.
2007-05-19 15:57:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leave it to an uneducated liberal to ask a stupid question, sorry but 1.8 billion Muslims cannot unite for nothing. Last time I checked the Sunnis and the Shi'as appear to be still upset of the title passing to Omar as opposed to Fatima or vice versa. The only Muslims that unite are the Salafis and the represent maybe 10% of that 1.8 billion. But oh yeah you are one of these white liberals who wants friends of color, not your fault, your parents were hippies who hate everything about the USA and love all people who want to kill whitey!
2007-05-19 15:58:11 · answer #3 · answered by Bill D 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My friend, let's get this straight, it not all muslins...it is the radical fundimetal Muslims who are hell-bent on killing infidels (non Muslims). The whole westernized Christian world is under attack, not just the USA. As you saw on 9/11 they finally showed they hand. It would have happened soon or later. Get used to it. This is history playing out all over again. Besides, bin Laden is already dead. The radical Islamic PR machine have been very clever in hiding that fact.
2007-05-19 16:02:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We are not at war with "1.8 Muslims." We are are war with a radical ideology of hatred and domination, a small percentage of Muslims who have resorted to the indiscriminate slaughter of thousands of innocent men, women and children to further their demented agenda.
Throw in the towel - and see how many more join their victorious brethren.
No one "attacked Islam" - we attacked the psychotic terrorists who want simply to control the world with Sharia law.
As far as "Bin Laden and company," is it not the "company" that we are presently attacking?
2007-05-19 15:56:12 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hind site for the original loyal Bushie, GWB. Had he put all his troops in Afghanistan and concentrated in capturing bin Laden, it would have been his legacy to capture and punish the person who made the 9/11 infamous.
2007-05-19 15:55:01 · answer #6 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously he weighed all the options. That's why the war in Iraq is so successful.
that's sarcasm BTW
2007-05-19 16:04:32 · answer #7 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know the answer. Sooner or later the global caliphate would arrive.
Btw BL works for US.
2007-05-19 15:52:02 · answer #8 · answered by Wonka 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. He wanted revenge against Saddam and gave it no further thought.
2007-05-19 15:57:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I perceive it a little differently. I see the Muslims as the aggressors who started a war with us.
2007-05-19 15:56:47 · answer #10 · answered by Mother 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋