English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why can't Democrats every put forward a viable candidate? When you watch Republicans like Guiliani, McCain, Huckabee, Thompson, you can look at them and say: "Now there's a President." When you look at the Democrats you say: "Now there's a real loser." Right?

2007-05-19 06:57:07 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

jaja,

This is Harlem, Detroit or Compton. Your opinion doesn't belong here.

Kim

2007-05-19 07:20:17 · update #1

EDIT: "Isn't"

2007-05-19 07:21:00 · update #2

27 answers

How many times can Barrak Hussein say his dad is black before people quit caring, Hiliry is a commie and Edwards is a sissy. Guiliani/Huckabee08

2007-05-19 07:12:20 · answer #1 · answered by Jimmy8910 1 · 1 7

Wrong again. The Democrats are very happy with their choices. Clinton is consistently the front runner while everyone else moves around her, she'll be the Dem nominee. In the meantime, Republicans are lukewarm on their choices and aware that they all have problems. Try watching some political programs if you can find time inbetween trolling. The talk is all about what the Republicans are going to do for a viable candidate - and that includes Fox News.

2007-05-19 08:28:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I registered as an Independent just because, but I wouldn't say that the Democrats have no viable candidate simply because the Senator got a pricey haircut. He can afford it. Our current President spent his first few MONTHS in office on vacation and back home in Texas. Guiliani is running based on showing support after a tragedy in his city. He should have been there, he was the Mayor. He did his job. That is his platform, "I did my job?" Come now, I don't know the politics of the others, it's not time for me to know, the Republicans and Democrats haven't sorted out amongst themselves whom they are going to put forward, yet I wouldn't call Hillary a Hussein or disparage of Senator Edwards because of his pricey coif. Guiliani's third wife enjoys discussing his sexual prowess in public. I can't tell you the chills I got over that TMI! Is that a First Lady? Will he keep her, or chuck her and marry his intern?

2007-05-19 07:03:49 · answer #3 · answered by a p 2 · 7 3

Yep, we're serious.

And your candidates...please...McCain has completely sold out his own beliefs in order to be elected...talk about pathetic...I would have voted for the McCain of 2000....the McCain of 2008...no way...not the same man. Huckabee...you must be kidding...we really don't need two village idiots from Hope, AR...wouldn't you agree one is enough. And Guiliani...well he's almost one of our guys...too bad your team won't vote for him in the end.

Me personally, I like Ron Paul. He's what you conservatives used to be..."conservative". Too bad he won't get your team's nod either. I'd vote for him Republican or not.

I do agree with you about John Edwards. He's all style and no substance. Obama isn't ready, but would make a nifty Vice President for Hillary and then onto the presidency after that.

So buckle up and enjoy the ride. It'll be different that's for sure.

2007-05-19 07:07:29 · answer #4 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 6 2

Are you F&)(*$##$ SERIOUS? Guiliani is as special interest as it gets!!!! Do your research lady!!!! He made sure that the Yankees were very well taken care of yet cracked down on people accepting TICKETS to a Broadway play as a thank you gift for saving their lives! At the same time, he looked the other way when his buddy Kerik(may be misspelled, but I don't care) got his house remodled for free! I don't even want to think about McCain Huckabee, my head might explode. Seriously, your head needs to get checked if you think ANY of them are worthy of being presidential candidates, much less winning.

2007-05-19 07:10:52 · answer #5 · answered by jajais4u 2 · 5 2

i think of you're being somewhat adverse proper to the mind of southern human beings. i do no longer have confidence they are that stupid. For one situation, claiming that his middle call has any touching on his character is ridiculous. Do anyone named Donald have particularly undesirable hair? Do all adult men named Simpson homicide their better halves? Do all women named Angelina look as though action picture stars and date Brad Pitt? i do no longer think of so! And till you basically on no account attend college previous the age of 9 or 10, you're no longer likely to be greater impacted by potential of your education as a new child than you're as a youthful person. Obama additionally attended a Catholic college as a new child, Columbia college and Harvard regulation college as an person. He has attended a Christian church for some years. Are you rather attempting to make the case that human beings in the South are so illiterate themselves that they are in a position to't delight in the income of a nicely-rounded preparation, or choose a individual based upon the way he lives his existence and does his job? as much as now as your fact that he attended "a thorough Madrassa college that knowledgeable each and all the 9/11 terrorists," you're purely flat incorrect. He went to college in Jakarta, in Indonesia. The terrorists have been Saudis. From Saudi Arabia. did no longer you be attentive to that? I wager maximum human beings from the South be attentive to who destroyed the international commerce centers. it is been in the information lots. Oh, and thank you for YA, considering which you own it. it particularly is a large communicate board from which to refute bigots and disinformation geared in direction of the overly credulous.

2016-12-11 14:11:34 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What's shocking about Libs is that they have practically the entire media slowly and inexorably brainwashing everyone from the time they are old enough to watch a newscast or read a newspaper, and still, Conservatives are beating them at the polls.

I fully understand why so many people are Liberals. The mass media selectively chooses the stories they want you to read. It's shocking that all the progress we've made in Afghanistan and Iraq is never reported. How about the most recent debunking of the Global Warming theory? The press won't reveal the truth; it's not part of their agenda. (for open minded people, just Google "The Great Global Warming Swindle", and you will see a video that will make your jaw drop.

What about Libs in general? Aren't they humiliated at the comparison with Conservatives?

Arnold Schwarzenegger vs. Alec Baldwin
Drew Carey vs. Janeane Garofolo
Ronald Reagan vs. Jimmy Carter
Pete Sampras vs. (choose any pampered, overpaid athlete)

Maybe we can start "Lib" jokes. "Hey.... did you hear they found a smart, informed person at the Democratic National Convention? It's true! A Republican got separated from the tour group."

2007-05-19 07:27:56 · answer #7 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2 6

So, the worst you could come up with against Barack Obama is that his middle name is Hussein, and the worst you could come up with against John Edwards is that he overpays for grooming? I see you wisely decided to not try to attack Hillary Clinton at all.

Whenever people start stooping to childish name calling, it means that they have no substantive arguments left.

Sorry, sweetie. America is sick of all the destruction that the neoconservative Republicans hath wrought.

2007-05-19 07:44:53 · answer #8 · answered by sparky52881 5 · 5 1

Smells like fear in here....wasn't there a lot of this nonsense spewed before the last elections...how'd that work out for the Republicans again?

Man I hope John keeps supporting this idiotic war...it's going to be hilarious when one of those "losers" carries every state.

2007-05-19 07:04:26 · answer #9 · answered by Franklin 7 · 10 2

Wrong my dear, you Republicans may shy away from your duty, but the liberals won't,:
Declaration of Independence, Patriotism quotes:
But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

2007-05-19 07:29:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

I agree that I trust the Republicans to do whatever is necessary to protect us from terrorists, and I don't believe that the Dems have the stones for the fight. The Dems running are all liberals, although Clinton pretends to be a moderate (she is exposed in Bay Buchanan' s new book, "The Makeover of Hillary Rodham Clinton").

I do not trust all the Republicans on the illegal immigration issue, and the Dems are all for amnesty for most illegals. McCain, Giuliani, and Brownback are strong supporters of amnesty for the illegals. Romney is now talking tough about illegal immigration, but he has changed his stances on so many issues, that I can't trust him on this extremely important one.

The only Republican candidates who can be trusted to protect our country from terrorists and stop the illegal alien invasion are Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, and Ron Paul. Check out their sites below.

2007-05-19 07:07:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers