We seriously thought we could create peace in Iraq? Those people have been fighting for hundreds of years, and we seriously thought we were going to go over there and create peace in six months? Who gets the retard award for that one?
2007-05-19 06:37:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The peace in Iraq that we (America) disturbed was Saddam's peace.
We interfered with the rape rooms, and the torture palaces of his 2 depraved sons.
Many who disagreed with Hussein were forced to watch their wives or daughters be gang raped by his soldiers.
If there is to be peace in Iraq or anywhere in the world, people, good people, must stand up against the tyranny of thugs and terrorists.
Until we do that there is no peace.
2007-05-19 07:56:00 · answer #1 · answered by kazmania_13 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe the 10 points goes to -RKO-, I agree with everything. Even if there still was not peace in Iraq (which they have been fighting for hundreds of years) Who are we to get in the middle of it? Frankly let them kill their selves off if that's what they want to do! Now that we jump in the middle of it and being instigators.. we are now in the middle of it, and all Americans are in jeopardy. It is no longer safe to even be any where in America, ((not only from war but from natural disasters)). And that is why millions of Americans believe the 9/11 attacks were staged by Bush and his people so they can make the American people join his side....Its all crap, pure crap. I don't even want to bring children into a world of this much Chaos and disorder!!!!
2007-05-19 20:37:35 · answer #2 · answered by Sapphariee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bush administration had no intention of bringing peace or democracy to Iraq. From the very first day George W. Bush occupied the White House, his intent was to attack Iraq - at any cost, for three terribly 'lame' reasons:
1) The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein ever since the days of Desert Storm when George H.W. Bush was ridiculed, criticized and humiliated for not 'finishing the job' and ousting Hussein at that time;
2) Dick Cheney and his Exxon-Mobil buddies want all that OIL swimming underneath iraq's sands so they can get richer and richer and richer feeding America's addiction to cheap, easily-accessible foreign OIL;
3) Ever since World War II, the giant U.S. military-industrial complex recognized how profitable 'war' could be. So it bought up all the politicians, hired pricey lobbyists, and formed special interest groups to encourage and promote more 'war'. Thus, the U.S. was involved in the Korean Conflict; the Cuban Missile Crisis; the Cold War; Vietnam and Desert Storm all so that the 'war industry' could boost its sagging profits. A new 'war' was necessary so that corporations like the Carlyle Group, Lockheed-Martin, McDonnell-Douglass, Sikorsky and Halliburton could rape the American taxpayers and earn BILLIONS if profits.
From the very first day, this unconstitutional and illegal 'war' has been all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.
George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, William Gates, and all 535 members of the most arrogant, evil, cowardly, corrupt, incompetent Republican-led Congress in the history of the U.S.A. that allowed Bush to engage in this travesty should be tried in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity, and - if convicted, should hang just as they arranged for Hussein to hang. This is the most despicable unjustifiable mass murders since the days of Hitler and Stalin. -RKO- 05/19/07
2007-05-19 13:57:41 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
There was peace in Iraq before we got there, so how could we create peace? All we created was death and destruction; chaos from order.
2007-05-19 13:41:52 · answer #4 · answered by ceprn 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There will never be peace in Iraq.
2007-05-19 13:48:12 · answer #5 · answered by CT 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
did we think that or was it really all about oil etc! if the British and American governments were only concerned about peace then why do they ignore civil war and human rights violations in countries that have no worth to them?
2007-05-19 15:06:35 · answer #6 · answered by cathc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, and with the stoning mentality of the girl for having a boyfriend of different, is why being there is pathetic and the joke of the millennium
2007-05-19 15:11:12 · answer #7 · answered by xyz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe anyone involved in the "planning" thought that far ahead.
2007-05-19 14:12:03 · answer #8 · answered by adrianne 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
Here's the plan (really):
http://www.newamericancentury.org
2007-05-19 13:41:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there will never be peace over there never///
2007-05-19 19:32:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋