All of your answers are on this site.
http://crimeblog.us/?p=422
2007-05-17 23:54:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by CT 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are so many rumours and we really don't know what the police are thinking. However, they do seem to have done a lot more than was thought at the time.
The patio door was left unlocked (apparently in case of fire) so it is possible that Madeleine could have wandered off. If, however, the McCanns have lied, as alleged, about time spans then, right from the start, the police investigation was impeded. I for, one would like to know exactly when Madeleine was last seen alive.
2007-05-18 02:53:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is what I have been thinking. The door was apparently left on the latch so she may have woken up, found she was alone and wandered off looking for her mum.
The fact that no one has come forward with any info to claim the reward is also unusual. Maybe the kidnapper wouldn't have the balls/brain power to hand him/herself in but with a £2.5 million reward, why isn't their neighbour/wife/mother/mate on the phone this very second? A different little girl would be easy to pass off as your own, would imagine, but with her distinctive eye colouration, it will be very difficult to disguise Maddy. Why if she has been abducted has no one dashed forward for the reward? Someone must know where she is. Unless she is, I dread to say, already dead or she has indeed wandered off and has come to some harm and not been found...........
Let's hope for a positive result soon.
2007-05-17 23:59:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They say that the door and the window were closed when the Mccanns left for the Tapas.
When they came back the window was open and the door, too.
Could a small girl open the window, and then change her mind, reach for the door handle and wander off down the stairs, out of the house...?
It was already dark too, she would have been scared and would probably cry.
I don't think she left all by herself....
2007-05-18 01:06:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by S from Dublin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This reconstrucion does not extremely tutor what the police have been searching for. they'd have been employing it to objective the plausability of all theories. As commonplace, all and sundry is leaping to conclusions they desire to work out, be it that the reconstruction shows that the police now believe the kidnapping concept, or that they are exhibiting that the kidnapping theoryt isn't plausible. Me? - i've got constantly felt that the Mccanns have not harm their daughter, notwithstanding I no longer understand this, and extremely sense that we would desire to take each thing written interior the papers with a pinch of salt!
2016-12-29 10:00:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the police are saying she was abducted , then they have proof she was ...
Portuguese police doesn't say much to the media , but when they say , they are 100% sure of what they are saying
Remember , there must be a reason why portugal is one of the safest countrys on the world
2007-05-18 00:24:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A vaild point, she could of just wondered off, but If she hasn't been kidnapped or killed, she would of turned up by now, a child of that age can not hiden for 2 weeks and keep herself healthy. Im sure the police know what they are doing, lets pray that she shows up alive and well very soon!
2007-05-17 23:55:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any thing is possible however I think she has been kidnapped by some one wanting a child.14 years ago a little boy aged 22 months was took his mam still goe's back to Greece looking for him & lives in hope he will turn up on her door step.He was blonde & blue eyed.I hope they find her soon.
2007-05-18 00:43:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ollie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The police have more proof and leads than the public can know about until their investigation is over
2007-05-18 00:54:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by barbie doll 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sky news website has great imfo on your question or the Madaline website,failing that i was on the understanding that her abduction involved the window to the hotel
2007-05-18 00:00:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was wondering about that, but if she had just wandered off, im sure somebody would have seen her. It would be a bit peculiar to see a child toddling down the road in her pyjamas.
2007-05-18 00:41:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by sarah 6
·
0⤊
0⤋