At a Phoenix area high school, a bright honors student who wants to become a doctor had submitted his personal bio for the yearbook in which he attributed his success to God. But there's a "problem." The Constitution says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof" so the school changed his words to "attributes his success to others." Does anyone else think our founding fathers would think Americans in the year 2007 were a bunch of idiots for interpretting the Constitution that way??? Anyone who interprets the "CONGRESS shall make no law.." to mean that a high school student can't say "I attribute my success to God" in his own short bio in a yearbook is a moron. Especially considering the "OR PROHIBIT THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF" which comes right after that. It's sad what liberals have been trying to do to this country.
2007-05-17
21:05:43
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics