So its his fault that mexicans are killing people? There hasn't been one terrrorist attack on american soil in years, thank you Bush
2007-05-17 16:26:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Yes, but it isn't going to happen as the Democrats do not have enough votes, they need 2/3, to convict him! That is exactly why Clinton was never impeached. They failed to get the 2/3 vote!
If he does something stupid, like attack Iran, he'll probably be thrown out of office and charged with a crime! The House is taking away any authority he might think he has to attack Iran!
He is still selling Iran F-14 airplane parts, which is against the law! Guess who the main culprit is. The Pentagon. Now there is proof that they are 2 blades shy of a sharp edge! Thanks Nancy for the saying!
2007-05-17 16:32:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
What would you do if you were the president. There are a lot of issues to be addressed in this country. Being one person with all that power and several opinions surounding you how would you handle them. It is easier said than done. I think he is doing ok. Not everybody is perfect but I am skeptical on whats going to happen next year. This country will wish he was still in office.
2007-05-17 22:03:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by This is Fun 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You missed the mark. Let's ask a hypothetical question.
Do you think that the Republicans would have impeached Bill Clinton if his domestic policy had been the same as the Bush Administration's is now?
2007-05-17 16:30:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Encantada 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I definitely agree that he should be impeached (though I'd hate to see Cheney in charge) for his crimes. But looking the other way, or sticking your head in the sand, shows that we don't care what crimes he commits, as long as there's a mention of 911, we let him do whatever he wants to. And that raises (or lowers) the bar for the next president, giving him more power, because we don't care. And no one turns down power, regardless of their party.
2007-05-17 18:32:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by jerseygyrrl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly. The government blackmails us with the taunt that they WILL start enforcing immigration laws IF they can give amnesty to the illegals who are already here. Who believes them?
Our way of life will be gone in just a few decades. Forget the War on Terror, they've already followed us home. And we won't even recognize the western world soon.
2007-05-17 16:33:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by tttplttttt 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
1) He hasn't violated his oath of office.
2) He should not be impeached.
2007-05-17 17:35:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Since he hasn't nor done anything else impeachable, I'm gonna have to go with "no." How many times are you people going to bring this up?
2007-05-17 16:37:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
He swore to uphold the constitution and then authorized unconstitutional domestic spying programs. He knew they were unconstitutional at the time and he authorized them anyway!
2007-05-17 16:31:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by truthspeaker10 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Impeached is synonomous with dethroned. That is little punishment. I think he should be demoted to an infantry soldier on the front lines in Iraq.
2007-05-17 16:27:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
from hearing the news impeachment is just around the corner.
2007-05-17 16:29:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋