Whatever his personal characteristics might be, Ron Paul has told the truth about the relationship between Israel and America, specifically that Israel controls US foreign policy. Jews sympathetic to Israel own the media in the United States, including television, the major newspapers, the major book publishers, and the nationally distributed magazines. With their control of the media, they determine who may *effectively* run for public office in the United States. Zionist organizations also supply a major part of the campaign financing, which is in large part a rerouting of some of the American taxpayer's own money, which Congress had given to Israel the previous year.
2007-05-17 15:42:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by blaringhorn 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul is solidly conservative, using the historical definition of the word. He believes in limited government that abides by the constitution. For the social conservatives out there, Paul's right-to-life record is impeccable - vastly better than Romney, McCain or Giuliani with all their flip-flops. True, Ron Paul is anti-war. Is that supposed to make him liberal? Along with other "liberals" like Pat Buchanan?
Paul is the one voice of reason among the republicans today. He has no chance of getting elected, but I sure hope he can make a few waves before he bows out of the race. Anyway, he's absolutely correct about foreign policy. He's been on the foreign affairs committee in congress for a long time, and unlike Giuliani, he's very familiar with the intelligence on terrorism and the war. The whole "they-hate-our-freedom" bit may be acceptable from a middle schooler, but it's not presidential material.
Unfortunately, the republican establishment isn't ready to come to grips with the truth. Even as republicans are turning away from Bush in droves, they're busy trying to find "Bush lite" as their next candidate.
2007-05-17 14:42:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bramblyspam 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
To all the fruitcakes obtainable that think of Rudy Guiliani has the coronary heart to stand on the line the place become he while it got here to serving interior the protection stress? in reality, the place have been you? under 13% of people stricken to serve in any respect and maximum of those would possibly no longer have completed so had they no longer been drafted while the draft become status-quo. Rudy Guiliani is only a puppet for the vendors of the Federal Reserve as maximum politicians are. are you able to declare McCain or Romney? What approximately Clinton, Obama or Edwards? all of them artwork for the vendors of the Federal Reserve that's why we seldom get into the extra significant subjects of government and politics yet many times are relegated to superficial subjects and substance. Ron Paul is a patriot. Now notwithstanding in case you like what he mentioned may well be yet another difficulty completely yet how would you like it if the Communist chinese language were occupying the U. S. for the previous 20-30 years. in element to reality, that's what WE "individuals" have been doing to the Saudis and the actuality keeps to be that all the 9/11 pilots have been Saudi nationals. nevertheless clueless? i can't assist you and that i doubt anybody can.
2016-12-29 09:22:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey... I'm a Libertarian, and I smoke a lot of weed, too.
And I do not think Ron Paul is delusional. I'm just not sure his assertion that 50 years of U.S. policy is what led to the events of 9/11.
It MAY have... in its most basic sense, our support of Israel alone could prompt such an attack.
I'm more inclined to believe it was a combination of our promoting Zionism, our utter disregard for Arab lands outside the oil residing beneath them and our status as the richest country in the world.
Either reason on its own, however, is also possible.
So it's not clear to say whether Paul was correct or not. One thing is certain, however:
Giuliani never misses an opportunity to drop in his 9/11 credentials.
2007-05-17 14:48:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by B 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Gulliani blew it big time.
He actually had the nerve to ask Paul to retract a statement that was the truth?
The terrorists don't just hate us for our "freedom," as Gulliani would have us believe, but because we've been messing around in the Middle East for years, and bombing the hell out of Iraq...long before the events of 9/11.
All of this is supported by the 9/11 commission, which sides with Paul's version of why we were attacked, and not Guilliani's.
Guilliani doesn't desrve to darken the White House steps if he doesn't at least understand this much.
2007-05-17 14:28:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stan 6
·
5⤊
4⤋
No. Do liberals want to vote for Ron Paul or just taunt Republicans cause they don't want him? By the way the audience agreed with Giuliana. He doesn't have anything to be afraid of.
2007-05-17 14:30:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
1⤊
6⤋
Ron Paul is a whack job and not to be taken seriously. Rudy took Ron Paul to school big time.
2007-05-17 14:30:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
6⤋
3 words
Giuliani is delusional
2007-05-17 14:31:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul really is a Libertarian and smokes a lot of weed. He's out to lunch permanently.,
2007-05-17 14:25:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by oh beehive 1
·
4⤊
7⤋
That doofus goes on the Alex Jones Show. We should send him a tin foil hat and you too.
2007-05-17 14:26:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by melanie 3
·
4⤊
6⤋