any why?
2007-05-17 13:45:32 · 15 answers · asked by mymadsky 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gary, just answer the question
2007-05-17 13:56:30 · update #1
I start with the baby.
When you go into a fire you pick up the one who has the best chances to survive.
Got a question how many people would you kill in order to find a cure for acme.
I thought I give you a silly question too.
2007-05-17 13:52:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Well I would save baby of course in that situation. 1 I know what to do to help save a baby, and chances are the 5000 embryos are going to be used in some experiment by some scientist who knows.
2007-05-17 21:00:23 · answer #2 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would save the 1 year old if I can't save the embroys too. What's with the embryos? Is this a stem cell research center?
This has nothing to do with cons vs. liberals - it's a question of individual choice and morality.
2007-05-17 22:56:06 · answer #3 · answered by Think Richly™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Baby
2007-05-17 20:49:09 · answer #4 · answered by RS 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
A friend once ask me, if my house were on fire and I could only save one of my four children, which one would it be? My answer was then and is now, I would give my life trying to save all of them. Why? Because I love my children, and I value life. The friend had no children, if she did she would have known better than to ask the question.
2007-05-17 21:02:44 · answer #5 · answered by rosi l 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They are only concerned about the lives of those that haven't been born yet, so they would save the embryos.
2007-05-17 20:56:12 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The fully developed, fully functioning baby!
2007-05-17 20:53:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would save the baby. The cons would save the embryos because their rights are what the cons are concerned about. Cons have no use for, and do not care about a child. They prove it by not supporting child welfare and health care for underprivileged children.
2007-05-17 20:51:44 · answer #8 · answered by SlickWillie 3 · 4⤊ 5⤋
I'd save whichever one I was nearest related to. If I were related to none of them, I'd save whichever White offspring had the highest eugenic rating. (P.S. I'm somewhat to the right of the conservatives.)
2007-05-17 22:16:24 · answer #9 · answered by blaringhorn 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I choose not to have embryos created outside the womb.
2007-05-17 20:49:45 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋