English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since the whole mess began more than four years ago, almost 4,000 soldiers lives' were needlessly wasted. The war has since evolved into a brutal, bloody Vietnam-style quagmire. On a daily basis, I hear on the news about many of our troops are being wiped out by the insurgents' best friend-the IED. You know the rest of the story from there. Now do you understand why Bush needs learn this illegal war was a mistake? Would this be the single legacy of the President when "his folly" became a huge flop?

2007-05-17 12:34:55 · 17 answers · asked by brian 2010 7 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

Illegal war ?? So we are fighting 2 wars in Iraq?

The primary war that we all know about is certainly NOT illegal .. it was voted on by Congress. So I am not clear when you refer to the "illegal Iraq war" what you are talking about.

2007-05-17 12:37:45 · answer #1 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 0 4

Your view on the international is unhappy and pathetic. The Iraq warfare become nicely intentioned yet poorly done. US bombing did not reason the "lack of life of 500,000 little ones and pups," it is a bull **** statistic made up by utilising you or one in all of your socialist web content. the US bombing post-Gulf warfare become as a rule militia and aerial installations. So except the Iraqis equipped colleges and nurseries lower than flak cannons and radar stations (they did not), your "statistic" is inaccurate. As for being prosecuted, he will be prosecuted after Clinton receives prosecuted for Bosnia or Kosovo or Somalia or Sudan, and so on. no longer occurring. And the hot President, that one did not vote for the Iraq warfare because he turned right into a STATE SENATOR on the time. If he become in DC he would were a sturdy 'ol boy and obeyed his Democratic Senate administration. All in all, study a e book or a nonbiased source. Then faux you recognize what you're speaking about.

2016-10-18 08:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Of course I am sorry about those that died there. President Bush got rid of one of the biggest tyrannical leaders in history. Yes, there are problems there - no denying that, but the country has been suppressed for years. They don't even know what freedom is, so this is very difficult. S. used chemical weapons against his own people. S. murdered Shi’a clerics. S. destroyed villages. S. used military force to repress civilian populations throughout the country. In the 1970s and 1980s, the Iraqi regime destroyed over 3,000 Kurdish villages.

The whole world is better for President Bush's actions, and their people should accept the gift we gave them and learn how to live together.

2007-05-17 12:50:39 · answer #3 · answered by School Is Great 3 · 0 1

The Iraq war was not illegal, and I believe history will not judge it to be a mistake.

Sadam broke the terms of the Gulf War cease fire in 1998 when he kicked the inspectors out. After that, the US had a responsibility to take him out of power. Unfortunately, Clinton was President and he did next to nothing.

As far as it being a mistake, that rationale is short sighted. If you could go back in time to 1935, would you recommend Hitler be taken out before he started the war? It was clearly his intention.

2007-05-17 14:11:32 · answer #4 · answered by Hrankta 3 · 0 1

Aaahh Sweety, don't you fall for that stupid act the president shows, he won't learn, because he knew the minute he shifted the war from finding Bin Laden to envading Iraq, that he was doing wrong. He won't ever learn anything he doesn't want to learn, and when you do something that you are trying to sell to the Citizens of the U.S. as good for them, when in fact you know your doing it for yourself and your friends, you'll never admit you were wrong. Bush wants this war for his and his friends own benefit, you'll see when he's done his term, as I've asked in the past, do you think he will retire to his ranch in Texas when all this is over? Do you imagine that without all the protection he's had as president, he would ever be able to walk out and pick up the newspaper without a sniper waiting to pick him off for the destruction he's done to the United States, not to mention all the families who have lost thier loved ones for this man's selfish needs? No, he's not going to reside here in the United States, I'm guessing Iraq is pretty important to him, cause that's where he intends to go when this is over, but he has to make sure it's ready for him, and that means, nobody left who would come after him for what he's done to thier country. It also means draining the U.S. to the point that we will be incapable of going after him in retribution of what he's done. No, he's not going to learn anything, it's us that need to learn, and we keep passing the learning buck to the congress and senate and president and his administration, they know what they are doing, it's us who they want to keep in the dark, divide and conquer. Together we stand, divided we fall, what's happening here in the United States?

2007-05-17 12:49:40 · answer #5 · answered by Coulterbasher01 4 · 1 1

Bush will never admit to any wrong doing! The next President will have to clean up his mess. In the meantime far to many of our youth are dying daily for this war.

2007-05-17 12:40:00 · answer #6 · answered by Pamela V 7 · 5 1

Probably about the time you and the rest of the liberals in this country reach between your legs and pull your head out your cowardest ***!!! What are you doing about the HUNDREDS of innocent people that die in this country DAILY. When the People in Iraq wake up and fight for their own country we'll all be better off. Wake UP America!!!!!!

2007-05-17 13:02:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He knows already. He's just hoping he can nuke Iran, which will make this war seem like a happy memory and yet another distraction from Bin Laden.

2007-05-17 12:38:02 · answer #8 · answered by King_Nelson_Brilliant 2 · 3 1

What the democrats in congress are doing is illegal and unconstitutional.

It seems you don't know why we are at war with Iraq. Iraq had connections with the Taliban who were attacking Innocent Americas who didn't need to die, on 9/11.

2007-05-17 12:39:41 · answer #9 · answered by Vultren.com 3 · 1 6

You should start by realizing that congress gave him all the 'legality' he needed to go to war. His big mistake, which is shared by all administrations since Eisenhower, is we have forgotten how you fight a war. To win. You win by killing the enemy until THEY say they've had enough, not by winning hearts and minds. Spill their blood and guts and their hearts and minds will follow.

2007-05-17 12:39:40 · answer #10 · answered by gunrrobot 2 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers