English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

go down as the worst speaker of the house in US history?

2007-05-17 10:47:01 · 17 answers · asked by voodewchile 2 in Politics & Government Elections

17 answers

You mean she hasn't already?

2007-05-17 10:49:22 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 3 2

Glimpse into the Mind of Nancy Pelosi
Everyone needs to really know this San Francisco witch!!!
A new leader? Be very concerned! Everyone should read this......

*It is hard to believe there are American citizens who support her
theories and can make any sense of what she spins. Take a good hard look
at what she wants. Take special note of the last paragraph.*

Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just
another example of Bush policies helping the rich get richer".
"First Bush cut taxes for the rich and the economy has rebounded with new
record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers are
getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class".

She went on to say "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq
our economy is still strong and government tax revenues are at all time
highs. What this really means is that business is exploiting the war
effort and working Americans, just to put money in their own pockets".

When questioned about recent stock market highs she responded "Only the
rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare
recipients, the unemployed and minorities are not sharing in these obscene
record highs". "There is no question these windfall profits and
income created by the Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate
and those dollars redistributed to the poor and working class".
"Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working
class who, by their hard work, are responsible for generating these
corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich.
We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits
or to control the stock market to prevent this unearned income to flow to
the rich."

When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments
in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401K's, and the stock market she
replied "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for
90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more "trickle down"
economics claiming that if a corporation is successful that everyone from
the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security
which is ridiculous". "How much of this 'trickle down' ever get to the
unemployed and minorities in our county? None, and that's the tragedy of
these stock market highs."

"We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we
take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates
on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower
Federal income tax payers off the roles and increase government income
substantially. We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in
our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."
When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied "We need
to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed, and minorities.
For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our
country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities.
Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee
these people the standard of living they would like to have as
'Americans'."

Is this not a Communist talking??!!

2007-05-17 17:50:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

It is too early to tell. She is definitely on the right track to achieve the title.
She heads a list of people that are perfect proof why term limits aren't a bad idea.

2007-05-17 17:56:45 · answer #3 · answered by Stan S 2 · 1 1

im pretty sure she is. I'm usually one who always agrees with most government ideas, but she is one of the worst politicians ever. im pretty sure she is a terrorists sympathizer. In fact, last week, she threatened to sue bush and put him in jail if he vetoed the next troop withdrawal bill. she is just terrible.

2007-05-17 17:55:30 · answer #4 · answered by a cool person 3 · 1 1

she is already on her way..this is the greatest do nothing congress of all time, and once the GOP go back to their conservative roots, they will take back the house, keep the senate and the whitehouse

2007-05-21 16:36:40 · answer #5 · answered by nobody a 1 · 0 0

No, that would be Dennis Haster the one that allowed child molestors acess to young intern pages....

2007-05-17 17:56:05 · answer #6 · answered by Adrian A 1 · 1 1

We don't know...but its sad how many people who answer WANT her to do a bad job...thats not cool! e

2007-05-17 17:55:51 · answer #7 · answered by pandurtle 6 · 0 1

Yyyyyyyep!!!

2007-05-17 17:49:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Yes, she meets with terrorists.

2007-05-17 17:49:15 · answer #9 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2 2

Yes, I believe she will.

2007-05-17 17:53:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

She is trying, that's for sure.

2007-05-17 18:06:27 · answer #11 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers