Why did the firemen of 9-11 say the buildings were "detonated"?

Question

search video of 9-11 firemen demolition" no building ever fell as quick as that or in that manner...fools here say "oh no Bush wouldnt do that!!" if you dont think so you are evrey very ignorant of history and what kings do for power and $$$

athe steel was quickly removed and sold to China..no examination of it...Neal Bush ran security at the towers...hhmm? if you cant buy that evil men would do anything for [power and the worlds oil resources you better go put that disney movie you live in back on your 800 channel TV that seems to have taken away your mind...

Answer 1

They (the firemen) never said that. They said it sounded LIKE a bomb, which is a good description. They never said, "we think the building was detonoted." This famous misquote is old news.

Moreover:

1. All the world's experts have decided that the planes brought down the Towers. How do you explain away that?

2. Since the President of the US is arguably one of the most powerful people on earth, he already can use his connections to generate as much money as he needs. Why would he risk such a risky, outrageous plan involving 100s of people, any one of which could rat him out?

Answer 2

I am mid 50's and other than a B-24 hitting the Empire State building, I have no knowledge of anything like this happening before so how can ANYONE say " no building ever fell as quick as that or in that manner????"

Two airplanes, thousands of gallons of fuel, temperatures reaching about 2800-3200 degrees ( steel melts at 1800 degrees) caused the steel and concrete to fail. How many tons of downward pressure do you thing the tops, above the impact areas, placed on the damaged sections causing the collapse????

I guess you believe in the tooth fairy, the Easter Bunny and Bush drove Katrina into New Orleans all by himself too.

Answer 3

Ugh. Ok, find the fireman who said that and get him to testify in court that he found the bombs that were signed "From G.W. Bush with love xoxoxoxo" at the site.


Here are the problems with the idiotic evidence that the conspiracy people put forward.

1. They look at the videos and find some sort of odd detail or inconsistency and blow it out of proportion. Perhaps the fireman at the scene believed that there was a detonation. That does not mean there was a detonation. It just means that a person at the scence thought there was. Witnesses can easily be fooled. I am willing to bet that if you found that firefighter today, he would say that he does not believe that there were explosive charges detonated in the WTC buildings.

2. Even if there were charges in the building, there is no evidence to support that Bush or anyone else in the US government had anything to do with it. There is a gigantic leap of logic here.

Everything that the conspiracy theorists put forward is complete and total speculation. That is why they are not taken seriously. That is why there is not going to be any court case to prosecute the people the conspiracy guys say are responsible.

Answer 4

A plan hit the development Any type of small explosions ought to ensue after this way of structural hit like that So firemen heard explosions How did anybody PLANT those bombs till now hand devoid of a hundred lifeless janitors or secure practices people? You cant take down a development with willy nilly located explosions you will desire dozens of controlled solid explosions planted completely by technique of ninjas to have not have been given any witnesses

Answer 5

I can think of two reasons:

1) The building collapsed with a deafening roar reminiscent of an explosion, and it was an apt description at the time.

or

2) The firemen noticed, as they were clearing the building, that thousands of tons of explosives and miles of detonator wire had been meticulously placed throughout the building, then were effectively forced to shut up about it by an omnipotent conspiracy.



I leave it as a test of sanity for you to determine which is more plausible.

Answer 6

Please, spare us the conspiracy theories. There's no proof that 9-11 was done by the U.S. government, just some creative interpretation of evidence.

C'mon, give me solid proof if you want to convince me - find me one government worker who, for example, worked in the Pentagon, saw plans for the attack and was ordered to keep them secret. And convince me they really were a government employee at the time, not just "my friend read on the internet about this guy..."

Certainly some political leaders have gone to unconscionable lengths to secure or increase their power, and Bush has made poor decisions costing American lives... but to accuse him of the cold-blooded and deliberate murder of thousands of civilian lives is not only absurd, it far overestimates his abilities.

C'mon, give me logical, rational proof... clear, unquestionable evidence.... something more than paranoid interpretations and ungrammatical rantings.

Answer 7

How about this - every super sky scraper which has ever been hit by a jet airliner filled with over 20,000 gallons of jet fuel and flying at maximum speed has collapsed within 90 minutes.

Every single one.

Answer 8

i am a cop and i say there was no conspericy. unless those firemen have a Phd in physics, they shouldnt talk about a building that size falling, because it has never happened before. so why not take my word on it?

(bush is not a king ;))

Answer 9

More proof that liberals are so weak on national security that they have to make up conspiracy theories in the face of a tangible threat...

Answer 10

I really enjoy your "question." This is exactly like the staged moon landing conspiracy theorists.

I answer your question with a question. Where will it end for you? When logic and common sense are not applied there is no end to your "theories."

But again I do enjoy them. Please educate us all on how the world really works! Start with spacemen!!!!