I disagree with Bush
+
Against ILLEGAL Immigration...
DeMint Statement on Immigration Deal
May 17th, 2007 - Washington, D.C. - Today, U.S. Senator DeMint made the following statement:
“I hope we don't take a thousand page bill written in secret and try to ram it through the Senate in a few days. This is a very important issue for America and we need time to debate it.”
“But the little we do know about the bill is troubling. According to reports, the bill contains a new 'Z Visa' that allows those who entered our country illegally to stay here permanently without ever returning home. This rewards people who broke the law with permanent legal status, and puts them ahead of millions of law-abiding immigrants waiting to come to America. I don't care how you try to spin it, this is amnesty.”
MORE on Immigration:
** DeMint OpEd on RealClearPolitics.com - Responsible Immigration Reform
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article...
I AGREE WITH HIM!!
+
2007-05-17 10:21:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Some of the Republican law makers have spoken out with their displeasure of the Bill. I am a Republican and you may go to my question and get a pretty good grasp for my feelings about it. It has been my experience as a 30 year veteran of law enforcement on the Ca. Az. Mexico border that illegals don't even register their cars. What makes Congress think they will come forward and pay a fine and register themselves. They will keep doing what they are doing.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvNuF3vwEsn2HVyNueoJoEjsy6IX?qid=20070517121201AA1axtf
2007-05-17 10:27:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by ohbrother 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Veto it. Perhaps the citizens of the country should march on Washington and demand real reform that requires each and every one of them to go back home and apply for entry. My wife and her family waited 5 1/2 years for their turn so don't slap me with the "anti immigrant" label. I'm anti-illegal immigration and I want the law enforced.
2007-05-17 10:26:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am hardly surprised that Bush stands with every other elected official in the US in thwarting the will of the American People on the issue of illegal immigration.
He /should/ veto the bill, but he obviously won't.
2007-05-17 10:23:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I disagree with anything Bush does. The House still has to accept this bill, I understand. I hope it goes to file 13 from there.
2007-05-17 10:34:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Those that know me, know I support this President in all of his initiatives EXCEPT for this issue and we break on this issue. I have written my representatives and have already communicated my displeasure with this agreement. Yes I want it vetoed.
2007-05-17 10:24:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
#a million the government does not could desire to deal with public guidance, purely homogenize it around the rustic so all training that are being taught are very comparable, and an identical undemanding standards for graduation are an identical. After that, it may be as much as the human beings of the state to verify how effectual they elect their very own infants to be. all of us with a million/2 a innovations realizes that NCLB is killing our academic institutions #2 super company farms now and back fall into the class of "relatives farms". there is not any could desire to enhance subsidies to them, purely eliminate those given to the multimillion dollar company ones. who're being paid greater to kill relatives farms in spite of the couple hundred right here and there we supply to relatives farms to maintain them from affirming financial ruin. #3 Bush prescription drug application remains being hated by using people who're utilising it, because of the fact it has grow to be a super headache for them and springs with much greater issues. #4 the Patriot act warrantless wiretapping without oversight, and protecting such stupidity. #5 merchandising nationalism as patriotism #6 Social courses do no longer could desire to be bigger, they could desire to be analyzed and changed slightly to lead them to artwork greater effectively and waste much less money, extremely of being gutted or additional funds thrown at them to restoration issues it quite is organizational extremely than economic. #7 4000 troops lifeless 30 thousand wounded one hundred's of thousands of lifeless civilians, billions human beings tax money , and the place is Osama? #8 knowledgeable human beings comprehend the version between socialism and liberalism. yet exceptionally else, something Bush has finished to spend our tax money on our very own human beings pales in assessment to the quantity of our tax money he's sending over seas to make specific massive company proceed to enhance their very own wallet.
2017-01-10 04:57:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've heard many claim that they don't like the bill. The Senate pretty much has agreed to pass it. It will find its greatest opposition with the House and the Citizens.
2007-05-17 10:23:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by MH/Citizens Protecting Rights! 5
·
7⤊
0⤋
It benefits big business so the rest of the repubs will belly right up to the trough and drink the slop that is drafted by Kennedy and McCain.
2007-05-17 10:24:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It has certainly reduced my willingness to contribute $$$'s to the Republican Party. But, I guess they really didn't need it.
2007-05-17 11:21:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by ML 5
·
0⤊
0⤋