English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

The same way we did 15 years ago----tell Israel to take care of it. They'll just bomb the developing site.

2007-05-17 09:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would demand that the International Atomic Energy Agency be allowed to inspect Israel's Dimona facility in the Negev desert. It was an Israeli nuclear scientist who brought to light that Israel had nuclear weapons. Mordecai Vannunu was kidnapped by the Mossad in Italy and imprisoned for 20 years in order to silence him concerning Israel's nuclear weapons program. We ask, or rather the west asks that there should be transparency concerning all nation's nuclear capability. Have we or the British allowed the IAEA into our nuclear facilities respectively? I don't think so. Remember, it was Israel that bombed Iraq's Osirik nuclear complex in 1983. Look where that nation is today! There is so much depleted uranium from our weaponry from the first Gulf War in the Iraqi environment that many of the children born there today are deformed or suffer from the outfall of radiation poison. Even our troops have been poisoned resulting in "flipper kids" and other side affects such as infertility. I am all for getting rid of nuclear weapons for the mere fact concerning waste disposal. However, this is not a reality and other nations will have to deal with the consequences that is now confronting us and their own people. If we are to respect a nation's sovereignty against our own nation's will to survive then a compromise must be met on all matters regarding nuclear energy. That means Israel! Only then will nuclear parity be a thing of the past. Iran fears the same outcome that has happened to Iraq. Would not you?!

2007-05-17 10:27:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

First of all sactions don't work because everyone knows if you have the money there isn't a thing you can't buy. The only good way to stop bomb making nuclear technology is to assassinate the scientists working for Iran giving pause to other meatheads who may work for them in the future. Plus covert strikes at areas intended to destroy or delay their ability to create nuclear arms. Take a lesson from the Israelis and bomb a reactor or three. But without these measures there are no true reliable ways to stop development.

2007-05-17 10:02:15 · answer #3 · answered by shewhosnameshallnotbespoken 2 · 0 1

of course the international could stop them! yet no matter if the international might want to, is yet another question. because of the outcome of globalisation, the international is getting smaller and countries are all interdependent on one yet another. So if Iran do effectively advance nuclear guns, many countries might want to be at risk and if Iran makes use of them, the economy of many countries might want to fall and the international might want to be panicking. yet countries may no longer be in a position to stop Iran. putting a stop to this nuclear application is a 2-way ingredient. no matter if the international places in attempt, yet Iran would not reply and proceed with it truly is nuclear application, no you'll do some thing. If Iran continues to be reliable on its stand, sanctions gained't artwork both.

2016-11-04 06:32:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Iran has the right to developtheir own nuclear tehcnology according to the Non-Proliferation Treaty that the USA has broken by supplying Irsael, Pakistan and India with nuclear weapons.
Also by their use of WMD in Iraq during the Gulf War & on 9/11/01.

2007-05-17 09:43:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

If you want political rhetoric, bombing them is the solution (even though we cannot be 100% certain that ALL the facilities will be destroyed).

If you want to think about it intelligently and use logic, then we cannot stop them.

We couldn't stop the Soviet Union, China, Pakistan, India, or North Korea either.

If a country really wants nuclear arms, then they will aquire them one way or another.

2007-05-17 09:43:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

All of our problems with the middle-east are because of Israel. That's it, they hate us because we support Israel. I personally have nothing against Jews, but Israelies are savages and maybe they've turned that way through years of warfare and having to defend their lands, but because of them we have to live with fear of terroirism. If it was up to me I'd choose America over Israel and hand them over to Iran and Iraq and Syria on a silver platter for a treaty.

2007-05-17 09:49:07 · answer #7 · answered by NORM 2 · 0 0

I wouldn't. It's a regional problem. Now if they develop a long-rang delivery system, I'd destroy them.

2007-05-17 09:44:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Its too late now, but back when it started we should have bombed the heck out of it.

2007-05-17 10:28:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

1 plane over Tehran.
BIG FLASH.
Mushroom cloud.

2007-05-17 09:44:51 · answer #10 · answered by chuck_junior 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers