To try and politicize the office of the US Attorney? Or he will he continue to "Stay the Course" and insist that presidential influence and priorities take precedence over the constitution and federal law?
And before the lapdogs start foaming at the mouth, yes we ALL know clinton fired ALL 93 attorneys. Almost every president since the inception of the Justice Dept has done so. And if you cannot tell the difference between the 2, save the embarrassment and just don't answer this question. Thank you.
2007-05-17 08:25:26 · 15 answers · asked by whydoesyahusuk 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is incapable of such honesty.
2007-05-17 18:42:43 · answer #1 · answered by The real Ed-Mike 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get your facts straight, Firing 92 out of 93 was an unprecidented move by an incoming President and the most ever fired. Secondly, US attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President and can be fired at any time for any reason. All the foaming at the mouth fake scandals that you Dems keep trying to invent, don't change that fact. Thirdly, read the constitution before you comment on it, so you will know what you are talking about next time.
2007-05-17 08:45:01 · answer #2 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It became into exciting to pay attention Spector consider Diane Feinstein. he's apprehensive that Bush has corrupted the exams and balances between the judiciary and government branches, and that the corruption is amazingly risky during a time of conflict. astonishing for a Republican to declare on television dazzling now!
2017-01-10 04:48:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of these things will happen. They'll never vote out Gonzales because they fear the next election -- at this point in politics any action is cause for negative campaigning, so no one is doing anything. They talk alot, but they don't do much.
2007-05-17 08:32:03 · answer #4 · answered by SkulleryMaid 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
President Bush seems to have a very difficult time with saying that he was wrong (remember when he was asked if he'd made any mistakes and couldn't come up with anything meaningful?). Therefore, my guess is that he would not say he was wrong in this instance.
2007-05-17 08:31:00 · answer #5 · answered by kearneyconsulting 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Has the President ever admitted that he was wrong?
These uneducated posters below me need to listen to Comey's testimony especially about the wire tapping and then come back and defend Gonzales.
2007-05-17 08:28:34 · answer #6 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush has a lot bigger things to admit being wrong about than Gonzales.
2007-05-17 08:30:30 · answer #7 · answered by Liz M 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
President Bush is incapable of admitting he ever made any sort of mistake.
2007-05-17 08:28:56 · answer #8 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't have an independent thought in his head. I'm beginning to suspect he doesn't have a rational thought in his head. In other words, it's pointless to try and understand what Bush will do in one situation or another. He's incapable of doing the job he has. That's pretty much all you can say about him.
2007-05-17 08:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No. Has Bush ever admitted to being wrong about anything? I don't believe so.
2007-05-17 08:29:50 · answer #10 · answered by Matt L 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋