My sister has a friend in Illinois that just recently found out she may be pregnat. She wants to keep the baby, but the husband is demanding an abortion. Can he force her to have the abortion? Are there laws to protect her from it? Also, he said if she has the baby then he is putting it up for adoption can he make her do that? I mean can he sign adoption papers without her consent and make her give this baby up?
Granted they aren't in the best marriage & aren't very financially stable, but it is against her beliefs to do this can he force her into it if she doesn't want to?
2007-05-17 07:41:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
He cant force her to have an abortion. He can not give the baby up without her consent. He cant legally force her to do anything she doesnt want to do.
2007-05-17 08:01:40 · answer #1 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The law will not allow him to do that, legally. However, I've seen more than one occasion where a mother has been forced/coerced into an abortuary by a man, presumably the father of the baby.
As to adopting the child out without her consent, that would be almost impossible. First, there would have to be a TPR (Termination of Parental Rights). If he were to threaten/force/coerce her into signing that, then it could happen.
2007-05-17 07:48:13 · answer #2 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He can't make her do anything. She has to consent to an abortion and both parents have to consent to an adoption.
2007-05-17 07:44:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It sounds to me like what that regulation is protecting is they're ending the being pregnant upfront, understanding there's plausible to the fetus' existence, yet they want the fetus to live to inform the tale if conceivable. Technically abortion would not propose killing an embryo/fetus; it potential "aborting," or upfront ending a being pregnant. that typically can't be performed devoid of killing the embryo or fetus because embryos and early-time period fetuses can't live to inform the tale outside the mother's womb, yet rather the point of the technique is to end the being pregnant. If that could be carried out at the same time as conserving the embryo/fetus alive, each of the better perfect. regulations and practices surrounding overdue-time period abortions might want to be very confusing. it truly is against the law in all states to abort a fetus after 24 weeks except the being pregnant poses an important possibility to the mother's health. "possibility to the mother's health" has been interpreted in a lot of diverse techniques, with some docs refusing to finish overdue-time period abortions no matter if the mother is dealing with doubtlessly existence-threatening issues, and different docs defining "possibility" and "health" much better liberally. Practices surrounding fetuses that live to inform the tale overdue-time period abortions are also a demanding section. some health care workers have claimed that they witnessed stay little ones being left to die after being further early, at the same time as maximum docs and hospitals say that that's superb and immoral. it truly is rather demanding to discover any sparkling info contained in the abortion debate because both aspect imprecise dissimilar useful practise. professional-selection activists gained't save information on what percentage abortions are optional as against medically mandatory, and professional-existence activists do not furnish practise about the deadly circumstances that particular styles of abortion are designed to attend to. i have been very disenchanted in both aspect' coverage of this concern, both their unwillingness to furnish finished practise to the usual public and their insistence on demonizing and portray one yet another as irredeemable enemies of human rights.
2016-11-04 06:15:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋