1. Watch the clip on this and read the comments by people, the man is a Sociopathic Liar: http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/17/bush-comey-dodge/
2. Bush is cunning Sociopath: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=bush+a+sociopath&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
3. Definition of a Sociopath:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociopath
2007-05-17 07:34:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
From what I read it is okay that some of you think it is okay for him to lie on just about everything that spews from his mouth. It doesn't take some people to long to see what he is all about and that has been corruption since him and his Administration took power in 2000. I am not amazed though how some of you only see what you want to see in this man, but you have been had for the last six years and thank God him and his corruption are gone in 20 months.
2007-05-17 07:52:00 · update #1
I see that the lemming Republicans are still as delusional as their beloved George Walker Bush. And they should change the diapers on their mouths at they are excreting something smelly again.
2007-05-17 08:03:40 · update #2
What amazes me is that there are still people who think he is a great or good president. Even after evidence that single spaced would take 25 pages with titles only and no detail.
As a presidential research scholar I am well aware of the presidents we have had in the past and can compare him with them. Beleive me when I tell you he will be at the very bottom for many many years.
One would think he would learn from his mistakes. When caught in a lie most people don't do it any more. He continues to lie and sets the example for the rest of his Administration to do the same. No wonder we are in the mess we are in the eyes of the world and in our own country.
Whoever is elected next year will be a refreshing change from the lies, arrogance, greed, corruption and incompetence of George W. Bush and his failed Administration.
2007-05-17 07:43:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
ok, it is going against my extra helpful judgment to declare this, yet i in my opinion don't have a call. George Bush became into elected by way of better than in simple terms Republicans, and he became into elected. He did no longer call for something! Why are some human beings nonetheless bitter over the reality that Gore lost? particular i might have lots particularly seen Gore win, yet he lost. It wasn't voter fraud or something like that, Gore in simple terms did no longer have the votes he mandatory to win Florida. each and every significant information employer has come to the comparable end. Bush gained Florida! Bush did no longer have something to do with 9/11. The assaults have been carried out by way of muslim terrorists. in line with risk you have forgotten the reality that they claimed victory over usa because of the assaults? then returned, I doubt you ever particularly cared. that's not in simple terms HIS conflict, in case you forgot, the assertion became into undergone the two Republicans and Democrats. no longer purely Republicans! hundreds and hundreds of persons left with out a house or a activity? Get actual! Oh, one final project. Paragraphs are your pal, study to apply them.
2017-01-10 04:41:42 · answer #2 · answered by aegerter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must think Bill and Hillary were pillars of innocence. Ever studied how many people died mysteriously in their wake?
Odd how Vince Foster was found with no blood around him and the gun was near the weak hand.
Don't expect to hear the truth from any politician. Learn to read between the lines.
2007-05-17 07:52:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Too funny - first people say that he is an idiot that cannot form a complete sentence.
Now he is a cunning Sociopath.
Which is it?
Ashcroft works for him. If the President needed something from him, why wouldn't he send someone to get the information?
This is the President, not same manager at Wal-Mart. Ashcroft isn't on some hourly wage, and can't be disturbed. If the President needs to get something done to run the country, then I guess he will do what it takes to get it done.
That's called leadership.
2007-05-17 07:43:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
I'm confused. First you said he "sidestepped" the question. This would indicate that no response was given.
Then you said he "lies" which would indicate that a (false) response was given.
2007-05-17 07:49:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Not a suprise he is a professional liar.
2007-05-17 07:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
But we already KNEW that, although Cons denied his mental shortcoming and evil mentality.
2007-05-17 07:42:35 · answer #7 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Do not needlessly insult the president of the US regardless of your liking or disliking. I suppose you are a Democrat who believes he ordered 9/11.
2007-05-17 07:44:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
Sounds like every one I've ever known when pressed about sensitive information. You want to call it side stepping and I call it national security.
2007-05-17 07:41:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
his Att. Gen. says it's OK to lie about what ever you want ! He does it ALL the time!
2007-05-17 07:41:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋