If the Libs/Dems/Socialists state that Lenin was a moderate?

Question

where does that leave the rest of the world? And how did they get to define what moderate is?

Oh, I see, Animal Farm and the meaning of what is is? They make up the new meanings of words as they go.

Answer 1

The redefining of language that was once commonly understood is a favorite tactic of the fascist/socialist. Examples, bigotry=support of traditional marriage, homophobia=support of traditional marriage, sexism=opposition to Hillary, revenue enhancement=tax increase, conservation=higher gas tax, fairness=racist policy of affirmative action, affirmative action=don't promote or hire the white guy, hater=republican, bigot=any Christian, Nazi=Israelis, disadvantaged=any non-white regardless of economic status, Victim=any non-white but also all white females, gays, and criminals. Diversity=get the white guy out of the room, Multiculturalism=replacement of western culture with inferior alternatives not offered by white males. Budget cuts=any time spending is not increased above the rate of inflation, Racism=the unwillingness of whites to put up with bad behavior from non-whites, Controversial=anything not in line with liberal policy(control of the border is controversial) Migrant worker=illegal alien, Hate speech=pledge of allegiance. I could go on and on but by now I'm sure you get ti

Answer 2

Lenin...a moderate...hardly...no he was far more dangerous. His was a man so consumed with his own world view and the belief that he possesed the right to impose it on his countryman. It doesn't matter whether he embraced communism or not...he was about his own absolute power and domination of the Russian/Soviet state.

Moderates don't have the inclination, energy, or the passion to bend others to their will and kill those who resist. The Lenins, Stalins, Trotskys, Hitlers, Robespierres or the world do.

For my money, men like Lenin are the most dangerous. They stand apart from the bloodshed that they themselves order and believe is necessary to complete their vision. They divorce themselves from responsibility for it even as they command it be done.

Lenin was every bit the monster that Stalin was...he just delegated the brutality with more grace and skill.

Ultimately, when you kill another man over political ideology...you are only one thing...a monster.

Answer 3

I don't know a single liberal or Democrat that thinks that Lenin was a moderate. The only person making stuff up here is you.

Answer 4

Liberals and Democrats have never stated that Lenin was a moderate.

Tell me, does it hurt to be a Sean Hannity/Rush Limbaugh puppet?

Answer 5

WTF are you talking about? Once again a straw man argument representing no real Libs/Dems/Socialists (who of course you all throw together as being the same thing).

Lenin was not a moderate. I challenge you to produce anyone who claims that he was. Too bad you can't deal with reality and instead of having to create fantasy opponents.

Answer 6

Bushites love Trotsky and Stalin. So Lenin would be a moderate.

Answer 7

Where did you get such a lame brained idea? Lenin was no moderate. He was a radical as Hitler was a radical. Are you going to say Hitler was a moderate?

Answer 8

1984 is a better Orwell book. Reminds me where the GOP is leading this country. Nice Job Big Brother.

Answer 9

all politicians are the same thing, a politician, one who seeks power through deceit, what would happen if a strong person of middle class descent with middle class values, hell we might just do things right

Answer 10

Screwed.