English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OK, I'm a liberal, but, you really have to wonder how incredibly insipid and narrow minded our democratic leaders can be! Global warming requires addresing, BUT NOT IN THE SENSE OF DEFENSE SPENDING.

2007-05-17 04:36:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Osama, below, OK, maybe a real and tangible threat, but there is NO military solution here, just, a political solution. You don't hire a cop or soldier to get a neighbor to use new fuel sources!

2007-05-17 04:47:49 · update #1

6 answers

Much of what is going on in the Sudan is related to GW. Read this issue of the Economist. Water and farmland are just as valueable as oil.

2007-05-17 04:42:41 · answer #1 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 0 2

You act like this is the first Congress to attach issues to other issues to try to ensure that they pass through.

EVERY Congress does that. EVERY SINGLE ONE. That's how the members of Congress ensure votes, by attaching legislation to other, unlrelated pieces of legislation. That's the way the game is played.

Defense spending is not some sacred cow; it's an issue like any other. If we weren't at war, I daresay no one would care WHAT it was attached to.

And the Dems aren't blocking defense spending. They're simply refusing to continue funding the war under the current circumstances. There is still a defense budget. They're just trying to deny increases to that budget unless something is done to make the war more efficient. Otherwise, we're wasting money.

2007-05-17 11:47:13 · answer #2 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1 2

That cross roads guy said it was a myth. His dying message to the world was there is no such thing as GW.

Do you think God told him to say that. Or did Bush's secret voice (BeJeebus) go down to Lynchberg and tell him that.

No matter what happens to the water lever Business is positioning it's self to make money off of your carbon plight.

2007-05-17 11:51:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

But it's a war on Global Warming! We're gonna kick Global Warming's butt!! Drive our SUVs, our Hemi-powered trucks, our single-passenger Hummers until Warming is done!

GoGo USA! War on Global Warming!!

2007-05-17 11:42:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It is not in the F.B.I. and Homeland Security job description. They have more pressing things to use their manpower and resources on

2007-05-17 11:44:50 · answer #5 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 1 1

the war on global warming! they'll try and defeat it with napalm and flamethrowers.

2007-05-17 11:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers