President Kennedy's Assassination vs Iraq?

Question

President Kennedy was assassinated in 1963. Today, TODAY!, they think that they have found evidence to support a theory that there were more killers of the President than the one 'convicted' in popular opinion and US governmental findings (L.H. Oswald). My question: If it takes 44 YEARS to come up with a final answer to that question (and we still don't know if it's final), why, and how, can we expect the same type of government panel to come up with the "REAL" reason behind the starting the Iraq war?

Answer 1

Two different situations. The possibility of there being more than one killer of JFK are MUCH more rational than the 9/11 conspiracy ravings. Scientifically speaking, the 9/11 findings are logical and pragmatically speaking, it would not be POSSIBLE for as many people that would have been required to commit the 9/11 conspiracy and ALL OF THEM TO REMAIN QUIET EVEN AS I TYPE THIS ANSWER.

Answer 2

do no longer have confidence those "the motor vehicle accelerated" solutions. If that have been the case, we would see each and every of the limo's occupants shifting "back and to the left". yet we do exactly no longer. And Agent Greer (the motive force) had his foot on the brake (different action pictures of the assassination practice this) till AFTER the deadly head shot. the two maximum conventional theories on how a shot from the rear ought to reason Kennedy to pass backward are a million) jet result, and 2) neuromuscular spasm. some sense it replaced into because of the fact of Kennedy's back brace. The jet result, that's patently bogus, in my opinion, is a phenomenon wherein whilst melons are shot with a severe-powered rifle, the melon strikes in the direction of the shooter no longer remote from him/her. the situation right that's that the rigidity with which the melon strikes is a lot under what's considered in Kennedy's reaction. Others have confidence that a neuromuscular spasm may be to blame. as quickly as the innovations replaced into critically broken, it quite is posited, Kennedy's muscle groups tensed. back, the violent action of Kennedy would not look to undergo this out. finally, Kennedy wore a inflexible back brace and a few sense that he replaced into propelled forward (certainly, the Zapruder action picture exhibits us that Kennedy's head did flow forward approximately 4 inches till now going backward) by technique of the bullet and the brace then compelled him backward. i'm uncertain relating to the opportunity of this one. some, which includes Dr. Cyril Wecht and confessed Grassy Knoll gunman (despite if there are some problems together with his tale) James archives are of the opinion that a bullet struck Kennedy from at the back of a chop up instantaneous till now the Grassy Knoll shot hit him in the main appropriate temple from the main appropriate front of the limo. in the tip, the acoustical info is what strikes me because of the fact the main compelling. It famous a shot from the Grassy Knoll at Zapruder physique 312 (the pinnacle shot is at Z-313). It replaced into this info which led the domicile opt for Committee on Assassinations to end that Kennedy replaced into killed consequently of a conspiracy (despite in the event that they felt that the Grassy Knoll shot ignored).

Answer 3

Not sure, but JFK started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5800 per year. Maybe we need to look further back than the Bush Administration.
God Bless America our Troops and Commander in Chief !!!

Answer 4

Kool-aid Alert!!!!!!!!