2007-05-17 03:55:49 · 8 answers · asked by lela 2 in Politics & Government ➔ International Organizations
It was a failure because the UN and the Clinton administration took a Serbian province and is handing it over to an Albanian insurgency. The common thought is that it was done to appease the muslims and keep mideast jihadists from entering into the fray as was done in Bosnia. It didn't work.
2007-05-17 09:14:15 · answer #1 · answered by sepp55774 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
United Nations are a failure by itself. It is a heavily manipulated, corrupted and biased organization. Kosovo is an example.
Concerning Kosovo, they turned their faces away when a superpower invaded a third world country and caused a humanitarian catastrophe.
2007-05-17 15:36:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
It wasn't a failure. The UNMK established Kosovo's Provisional Institutions of Self-Government and the well-respected Kosovo Police Service. And if it hadn't been for the UN Peacekeeping Force, the inter-ethnic violence would surely have been a lot worse.
2007-05-17 15:38:45 · answer #3 · answered by RE 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
How could you possibly call a mission without an objective a failure?
2007-05-17 21:26:36 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because someone with brains managed it's overall operation; he had to contend with congress that would cut funds, and area it occurred oil reserves are not excessively large.
2007-05-17 11:13:48 · answer #5 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
a failure in what respect?
2007-05-17 10:59:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Really, Lela, it is time for you to start doing your own homework. But to answer your question, much like in Africa, it was a failure in that it failed to act to prevent .....
2007-05-18 09:35:44 · answer #7 · answered by Curious1usa 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because it was Bubba's idea.
2007-05-17 10:58:35 · answer #8 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋