English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

RUSSIAN's (SAP) are busy searching up there,yet haven't found where the place it is situated.

supporting details:

How can they find what they're looking for ? when they don't even know anything about the " vaccu-lught stream",? or where in this world they canfind the lead for the way? perhaps
they should firstdive deep down under the sea of the south philippines,the world's one among the deepest water's that exists,there and only then,they can get the chance to pursue the quest for the impossible dream.one thing more, if onlymen of science now discover the co relations of time , the world standard time to the U.T.T.C.,THE UNIVERSAL TIME TABLE CHART , MAYBE NOW, WE'RE just one half step away from getting over there in the other side of the comic portals we so long to reach.Light years time to the world year time application if not "circumnastalized"to be one diamond square
in form, will not make it through towards attaining fulfillment of TRUTH and success over familiarizing--

2007-05-16 23:22:28 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

2 answers

I saw this from a documentary program some time ago. Here's the basic idea of finding other living beings in the future.

There's one neighboring stars where scientist had identified a planet that they think has a high chance of supporting carbon base life form like the ones we find on earth.

This planet is so far that any mission to this planet, even at 25% the speed of light, would take generations to reach this planet. Any two way communication is impossible. So a remote spacecraft carrying a supercomputer with an advance AI would fly to that planet and do all the exploring job, with the AI capable of "thinking" to make sure everything goes right. The result will be beam back to earth and reach us after years.

So far, while this may be a far fetch idea currently, I think its one of our best shot to find other life form elsewhere, as if they do exist, it's not necessary that these life form are intelligent ones like us capable of transmitting information about them self to every corner of the universe.

2007-05-16 23:38:53 · answer #1 · answered by Hornet One 7 · 0 0

the concern with your diatribe is that you've assumed issues that are literally not unavoidably authentic. certain, an illustration broadcast globally does fade incredibly right away. yet allow us no longer ignore that each unmarried celeb in our sky despatched its gentle to us in this kind. no matter if an alien civilization can't totally harness the skill of their celeb, they could modify it, occlude it, or otherwise employ the exceptional energies in touch to deliver indicators that we'd acquire. neither is that this the purely way an illustration may be despatched. we may instead decide which worlds are likely to host existence and deliver a coherent beam of power on to it. that's how we measured the area to the moon to interior of a fragment of an inch, and with better skill and the perfect calculations may may also deliver indicators to different planets or different stars. And if I keep in mind properly, there ARE communities attempting to do precisely that already. it truly is, although, elementary sufficient to word those explorations contained in the words of technological know-how. hypothesis: if extraterrestrial beings exist, they're likely to deliver out indicators as we did, and doubtless to even want to the contact us. attempt: construct and array and spot if we are able to stumble upon them. end: arrays can't stumble upon such indicators, to be able to assert that extraterrestrial beings are literally not sending out indicators of the varieties we are able to stumble upon. communicate: our arrays can't stumble upon all styles of indicators, and it truly is conceivable that indicators are time-constrained, so possibly further tests are merited. Or, to placed it yet otherwise, do you rather, surely trust that each scientist in touch with SETI is an fool (or a minimum of dumb compared to you)? possibly you should check out their artwork slightly better heavily in the previous you criticize them.

2016-11-04 05:09:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers