Is it Human landed on MOON????

Question

A Moon landing is the arrival of an intact manned or unmanned spacecraft on the surface of Earth's natural satellite. The first manned moon landing was the United States' Apollo 11 mission, commanded by Neil Armstrong accompanied by Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin. While fellow crew member Michael Collins piloted the command module Columbia, Armstrong landed the lunar module Eagle on the surface of the Moon at 4:17:42 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, July 20, 1969.

But most of the people in the world believe that, this is Actually a Big Blunder from America.

At that time every where Soviet Union wins..
1) They first send Satellite
2) They First send Animal to the Space
3) They first send Human to the Space
4) They first send a Robotic satellite to Moon called "Lunar Module"

Due to that reason American Govt. get upset and they conduct this dramma.

Now a days all the Universities ask NASA for that video film that they told recorded by Edvin

But now NASA told that is missed. because if any body check on that film they immediately identify this high tech dramma (now a days this is not a high tech dramma)

NASA themself publish that they lose there Moon Landing Video.
and Michael Collins later told ( I was read from one magazine) they are not gone to anywhere, It was conducted in Arisona Desert with high tech

Answer 1

Your first paragraph is absolutely correct, it is obviously a cut-and-paste from somewhere else. It then descends into lunacy. Then picks up again with the Soviet news, although I don,t think they sent a robotic satellite, I think it just crashed on the Moon.
The Americans sure did get upset, but that was back in the late1950s, after the Soviets get Sputnik up. That spurred the US into a real space race, which got them to the Moon first. Getting to the Moon seems a reasonable step, considering all the steps which happened before it, don't you think? They didn't just build Apollo 11 and go. They had 10 years of successes and failures, and each mission brought them closer to the Moon. The Moon landing was the always the target.

Answer 2

Yes; a good Q, biju.

I was about to ask the same type of Q when I thought about NASA!

Apparently, there are quite a few anomalies that just do not add up re the film itself, and a number of other impossibilities at the time; so learning from you that NASA now claims the film to be lost is yet another highly suspicious and almost impossible circumstance!!!

How could such a Landmark thing possibly be lost??
Firstly, physical filing cabinets were the mark of the time for keeping records anyway; I filed things myself in them.
... and they would have made extra copies of such an epic achievement anyway!!

Apparently, for one [I can't remember them all!!], there is no atmospheric wind on the moon; yet the United States flag was shown blowing at full stretch on the moon most of the time!!

Also, as the film showed a number of other scenes, it became quite clear that the ground directly beneath the Lunar module showed absolutely no 'kick-up' or disturbance'; yet it was a craft that had just come from over 240,000 miles away; there would have been some mini crater or 'dugout' section beneath the landing craft.

Also, considering the position of the sun at the time, many times the light source did not gel with the expected reality.

The craft or aspects of it would have been burned up due to the limited technology put into the craft's materials at the time.
[I cannot recall the precise claim on that one, but I remember it applied somehow]

There was also something highly irregular about the actual order of the filmwork itself, the scene and the camera at one stage, as well. Some film mark was in the wrong place

There were various other factors, including audio irregularities, but those few are only those I can remember being pointed out in a TV program a couple of years ago.

Good Question

Answer 3

What a load of rot.

Russia may have made many important firsts, but in all those cases NASA was only weeks or months behind, hardly a great deficincy in technology. Also, NASA often did things better. Russia sent a dog into orbit before they had any way to bring her back, so that was hardly a great technological leap: just stick a dog in a satellite. In the mid 1960s, with Project Gemini, NASA recorded its own space firsts. Gemini gave the world's first spacecraft capable of altering its own orbit, the first rendezvous in space, the first crew to spend two weeks in space, the first docking of two space vehicles, the first use of engines on one vehicle to move a docked stack of vehicles, and the first EVA with real work carried out in space. During that time Russia launched not one single cosmonaut into space.

While it is certainly true that Amercica was upset by Russia beating them into space, that is not a valid argument for producing a fake moon landing, because restoration of national pride is just as well served by a real landing. Better, in fact, since there is no danger of political embarassment later when the fake is uncovered.

And NASA makes all the film and video from every Apollo mission available. The public announcement of 'missing video' was in regard to some recordings made in a tracking station in Australia that actually received the transmissions from the Moon directly during the Apollo 11 moonwalk (America was on the wrong side of the Earth at the time, and the Moon was not visible from there). Because they received the transmissions and telementry directly, they made better quality recordings of the moonwalk than NASA itself did, as NASA was receiving a re-transmitted signal produced by the guys in Australia pointing a TV camera at a large screen and broadcasting that to America. There is nothing on the missing video that is not already available, it's just better quality.

It amazes me how eager people are to jump onto the 'it was all faked' bandwagon before even doing any great amount of original research themselves.

Answer 4

To fake the Moon landings would have been a far greater task. In the same way that "Dr Evil" somehow manages to build his evil empire beneath a floating island and then kills all of the thousands of labourers, payroll clerks, and all their families. And no-one ever lets the secret out. If the govt COULD fake the moon landings, going there would be a small enterprise.

Answer 5

We sent probes, we sent landers, there were no need for dogs on the moon. I don't really care what you're opinion is on the beliefs of other people in the world. If you check the history books they use in school, you will see the lunar landing taught in it

Answer 6

Neil Armstrong was the first man landing on moon....

Answer 7

the best way to get into a concise and exact answer is by using "TELEPHOTOGRAM M62 " machine. but the problem
is where can they find such machine? this kind of machine i am telling you, is the very key machine or by far the ultimate
computer machine that out smarted the recent sophisticated
computer machine ever invented by human beings.because
it has no problems with electronic applications .it can work by
itself with out having to depend upon connections to ELECTRICITY. meaning, with power failure, or "brown out's", it still is working out fine and easy.also the problem is ,if man
get hold of this machine just to use it for FAME,FORTUNE, and self promulgations to be a SUPERMAN,?OR A SUPER POWERFULL MAN,this machine then,can be just spoiled to the void or tilk.further more,this machine TPG M62 , IS NOT JUST AN ORDINARY MACHINE as this machine is of the outer diminsions property. ALIENS DO REALLY EXIST SOMEwhere out there in the vastness of the universal horizons man has never yet CONQUERED!!!!!!!!!

Answer 8

it is easy to convince some people to disbelieve things they did not experience themselves. But the idea of so many trips to the moon being fake is nothing but nonsense.

Answer 9

What video are you referring to? Ever bothered to search for it yourself? There are dozens of videos taken by the Apollo astronauts. Do a little research before you make a total *** of yourself.

Answer 10

What a bunch of gibberish!