English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My defintion of void is absolute Nothingness. As opposed to space void has absolutely no atomic particles or atomosphere. There is no light and no dark. Just nothing and nothing cannot be measured because it has no form.

My theory- I believe that space does in fact have an end and is not infinite. I think space is contained within the void. Scientist say the universe is expading based on the fact that atomic matter in space is moving apart. I think whats happing is space is expanding into the void.
If a spaceship was to travel into the end of space the vessel wouldnt travel through space into void. Rather the vessel would travel to the end of space and get eatin up by the void. Get swallowed by the nothingness. I think the only thing that can fill the void is the expansion of space.

2007-05-16 23:10:47 · 17 answers · asked by Future 5 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

The laws of physics apply only to Earth and its atomosphere.Not space.

2007-05-16 23:22:47 · update #1

Yes...There is room for the universe to expand because it expands into Void nothingness.
Nothin has no form therefore is shapless and limitless. And only exist as the end of space which the universe expands into.

2007-05-16 23:44:51 · update #2

Gene...This is a theory and not an idea. The supporting data is in the fact that the matter in the universe is expanding together unilaterally.
The matter in the universe is not moving independtly from other matter its moving conjointly from opposing matter. This proves the universe is expanding as a whole but into what? Into the void which can only be filled by the expansion of space as a whole!!!!!!

2007-05-16 23:49:28 · update #3

Ok..I was wrong about physics only applying to earth.Thank you I learned something. However, Newton's laws (combined with Universal Gravitation and Classical Electrodynamics in areas of strong gravitational fields. But I was wrong.

2007-05-17 00:58:08 · update #4

17 answers

You are right the universe is not infinite.
When the universe started there was nothing but the nothing had to have a potential and the potential had to be finite
The universe began with a single space-time pulse of minimum size and duration that expanded into nothing.
The time pulse restricted it's expansion rate at the beginning then it's radial expansion to the speed of light
The first thirty-billionths of a second was an accelerated expansion causing space to compress to an incredible pressure.
As matter emerged the density of space diminished but the expansion continued into nothing limited by the speed of light.
Space out paced all matter diminishing in density as it expanded,eventually going out of existence as it reached a minimum.
The void or nothing that existed before existence began had a finite potential but when space goes out of existence the state of nothing is infinite.
Space is a quantum entity,the quanta cannot expand,the expansion is due to diminishing density
Your theory is going in the right direction,stay with it.
An incident that happened and will never happen again.

2007-05-17 02:58:36 · answer #1 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 1 0

With the recent discovery of Dark Matter and Dark Energy, we are starting to understand to the best of our primitive ability that the universe is expanding faster and faster. So as time passes over the next billions of years galaxies will travel further away. Eventually no more stars or planets will exist, and absolute zero will be achieved, which is the coldest it can be, currently the universe is only five degrees from reaching absolute zero. So the universe will slowly become cold, dark, and flat, although it won't be nothing. As sure as some scientists may feel about this model, no one knows for sure, humbling isn't it.

2007-05-17 00:55:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

physics only applies to Earth? good thing you figured that out... we need to alert NASA so they can get started on figuring out Lunar and Martian physics before we go there and... wait... we've already been there and seen that the same laws apply.... So, perhaps physics only applies to these three bodies and it's different for all the other? The theory that energy cannot be created or destroyed might only exist in our universe, but considering how far it is, the stuff at the edge that is left over from the big bang and things like that I don't think we really have to worry about what lies beyond... we'll never get there

2007-05-17 00:48:03 · answer #3 · answered by Josh T 4 · 0 0

The universe isn't infinite, as shown by way of Olber's Paradox (see reference under for a whole rationalization). in short, if the universe is infinitely super, and infinitely previous, and has form of uniform distribution of stars, then the infinite universe theory may well be dazzling. besides the shown fact that, all of us understand that the universe does not extra healthy all of those standards, because of the fact area is black. If it have been infinitely previous, infinitely enormous, and had stars everywhere, then there may well be no path you ought to in all probability look that did no longer have a famous guy or woman in that path, in some distance - in all probability very super, yet nonetheless a finite one... this means that each and each available speck of sky may well be lit by way of a famous guy or woman in that path - it would hence be luminous, and not darkish as that's today. examine the hyperlink under for a closer description of Olber's Paradox. Now what you're additionally speaking approximately is parallel universes. there is not any way that we are able to think of of today to come across and coach, or to conclusively disprove the existence of parallel universes. If there are an limitless form of parallel universes, there's a universe for each possible contingency - no longer purely one in which you probably did no longer marry your husband, yet one the place each and every little thing is comparable in each and every factor, different than which you positioned 2 exclamation factors after "insert the different guy or woman in here" it fairly is in simple terms too some distance from testable to pastime scientists on the 2d. technology purely deals in questions / postulations whose validity could be conclusively shown or disproved, so there is not any longer a lot of study being executed on the existence of the parallel universe the place you ate blackberry cobbler earlier getting in to artwork this morning. EDIT: Stephen Hawking used this thought as a form of "answer" to his black hollow advice paradox, yet i hit upon it to be somewhat bit a cop-out.

2017-01-10 04:04:25 · answer #4 · answered by dettman 3 · 0 0

But how could the void swallow matter?

Matter is energy, and I don't know what law it is, but there is a law in physics that says matter cannot be created, nor destroyed.

So, you are where you began now. Now you have to explain how the void can exist, if it's nothing anyways. And how can it avoid the laws of physics.

2007-05-16 23:15:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think your theory is very interesting.

BUT, my question is: Where is the 'void' located?
I mean if there was a 'void', where would it be in the realm of everything?

Your theory says that the universe is being held in the 'void', what is the 'void' being held in?

Just some questions to ponder.

I find this whole universe thing fascinating...

2007-05-17 02:59:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonnnn24424 5 · 1 1

Where does the discovery of dark matter and dark energy fit into your theory?
Is there room for the universe to continue expanding more rapidly and forever?

2007-05-16 23:22:08 · answer #7 · answered by Bart S 7 · 1 0

the universe is as infinite as the mind will permit the concept of infinite to enter infinity is existence without beginning or end. The Universe is. don't try to understand the infinite as the human mind has not as yet been given the unlimited knowledge of GOD to permit such answers to come. the human mind is finite and limited by the scope of the imagination.

2007-05-16 23:32:04 · answer #8 · answered by pro am 2 · 0 1

that is a really good theory, it makes more sense than the theory in my science book. Just wondering, what is your theory on the end of the universe if there will be one, do you think the universe will collapse, keep expanding, or stop expanding?

2007-05-16 23:18:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

oh and you are? but I was thinking the other day that space and time might stop since the big bang only created a finite amount of energy, could it also have created a finite amount of space time? if ever space stopped expanding would time act independent of space????? or would time go backwards!!

2007-05-17 04:40:26 · answer #10 · answered by saosin 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers