2007-05-16 21:34:33 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Yes, the people's princess?!! Don't make me laugh.
She was an attention seeking, power hungry woman. Worst person for the Royal family in centuries.
2007-05-16 23:52:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Its the other way around. The Royal Family was a disaster for Princess Di......
2007-05-17 17:29:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No! No! No! you have it wrong. It was the Royal family that was the disaster for Princess Diana.
2007-05-18 13:12:00 · answer #3 · answered by Alfie333 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No! She gave the Royal family the class, humanity and compassion they had up until then been sadly lacking. Without her the royal family has gone back to be just another boring family.
2007-05-17 05:57:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the Royal Family is a disaster for the Royal Family.
2007-05-16 21:38:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A teenager who was duped into believing that her future husband loved her? While he and Camilla were in bed together laughing about the upcoming wedding, Diana was being subjected to a gynecological exam to prove she was a virgin. If she was such a disaster, why did the Royal family let her into their inner sanctum in the first place?
2007-05-17 02:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think we'd be nearly as interested as we are today in all of them had it not been for Princess Diana. I think she put new interest into what seemed like an old institution to most Americans.
2007-05-17 09:48:56 · answer #7 · answered by .. .this can't be good 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no she wasn't she was the best she had a heart she cared about all she met she had no prejudice's at all she was a true angel! she did more for the public than the queen & the rest of the royal family have ever done for the public!!!
she showed she cared she did alot more than most in her shoes the when she died the royal family lost the one who made it on her own and showed love to her children in public & didn't care what people thought she showed them there is more to life than being in the royal family!
2007-05-16 22:16:03 · answer #8 · answered by possums_gal_forever 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well she gave birth to the future King and in doing so injected some much needed good looking genes into the royal family.
I don't think her sons would think she was a disaster otherwise they wouldn't be here.
2007-05-16 23:04:22 · answer #9 · answered by molly 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. The Royal family was all ready a bit messed up.
2007-05-16 21:43:17 · answer #10 · answered by Poe B 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋