I thought Ron Paul was really good, didn't you?

Question

He tells it as it is. I might as well vote Republican.

He in fact a Democrat when it comes to foreign policy, but he doesn't know it :-)

thought Giuliani was playing on peoples emotions using the official 9-11 story which has now been discredited. He is rather weak on arguments. Not only Ron is courageous enough to tell what he thinks, he stays on argument and he does not support torture. (The US really doesnt look good to the rest of the world because of the illegal war and widespread support for torture among Republican fanatics who think Jesus will wash away their sins). Ron could have denied that US policies contribute to terrorism but that would have negatively affected his popularity. It si clear that the Reps are losing because people finally woke up to the fact that Silverstein did demilish building 7.

I do think if the Reps have any chance of winning 2008, it must be Ron. If he keeps on message, he may well attarct many Democrats' votes. We can continue saying that they attacked us because we are so good but this wouldnt solve a thing in my opinion. Yeah, we are so good, but that kind of misplaced patriotism isnt that heplful, really. You cant fool people all the time especially those who know about controlled demolition.

Answer 1

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate--in either party---who is interested in returning Constitutional government to the country. He wants to abolish the IRS, and has consistently voted against unconstitutional acts by Congress--acts that Bush didn't have any problem signing.

I will gladly vote for Ron Paul, and it's not coincidence that, after spanking Guiliani in the debate, there is a call to forbid him from participating in future debates. It's not as easy as spouting out senseless sound bites with no substance, I suppose.

And Ron Paul is the only one who had the courage and intellectual honesty to vote against the highly unconstitutional "Patriot Act".

Answer 2

He is the only candidate. It is just a real shame the media is trying to destory him. Look for the attacks to increase. If you knew your history you would know that he is not even close to being a democrat in foreign policy. Look at every war in the 20th century until the Bush's came to power. Perception is not reality. Nice 9/11 comments though, good to see you know there was a controlled demolition. I kind of want him to stay away from that issue although he does support a new investigation. I think ppl are not ready for it yet. I think he sould build his credentials on what he knows best- foreign policy and the money system.

Answer 3

Its about time someone came out with the truth. Popular or unpopular Ron Paul says it like it is. If anyone running understands foreign policy it is definitely RP. Those neoconservative and liberal morons have no idea why we got attacked on 9/11, Bin Laden himself said it was because we placed military bases in both of Islam's most holiest places. What if we had tanks rolling around in the Vatican, like that wouldn't piss of some x-tians.

Answer 4

Ron Paul thought it was our fault we were attacked on 9/11, a genuine Democrat value. And if we just understand them, we can somehow come to some agreement. A ridiculous argument, since you can't reason with insanity.
EDIT
Iraq supposedly surrendered after we bombed it for weeks not years, after it took over quwait (another muslim country). So we deserved 9/11 by freeing Quwait. It's the same democrat ideology that suggests we shouldn't fight terrorism because that will just make them madder at us

Answer 5

partly I guess but he hurt his chances when he said it was our fault that 9/11 happened. The reality is that Islamo Fascits have been at war with us for over 40 years not only us but all of the free world. They have attacked hundreds of countries and killed thousands not because we are over there but because we to them are infidels. They don't think like we do their life begins when they die or so they think. I say we get rid of them now before they grow even bigger sorry but I would not vote for Mr. Paul because of his stance on terrorists. Otherwise I like him. I don't really like any of the 10 that much but any of them is far better then any of the libs that are running on the Democrat ticket.

Answer 6

As an Independent-leaning Democrat, I'm inclined to agree.

Answer 7

No you can't reason with insanity but you can't reason with ignorance either. What Ron Paul said is unpopular, yes, but he also knows that when you bomb a country for years, there's going to be resentment and blow back.

Answer 8

Yes very impressive to see a Republican who stands up for what he believes and not just falling lockstep into the party mandates.

Answer 9

If the Repubs have sense enough to nominate him, he could potentially pull part of the Democratic vote.
No one has ever accused the Repubs of having too much sense though.

Answer 10

Hes great , boy has he gotten both party's scared