for all u people who believe in evolution?

Question

check out this: www.discovercreation.org

this is an actual scientist (YES, scientist, who actually uses science) to disprove evolution

if all of u ppl who believe in evolution are as open-minded as u say u r, look into this, and then talk to me, c if this changes anything, cuz it sure did for me

and were actually closer to rats (98%) then to chimpanzees (70-90%)

tell me one person who has proved it, as far as i know, its still a theory, not a law

and it doesnt mean there are not more people out there against it either, i just found this one website

and i actually have studied evolution, very in depth, so maybe u actually have the flawed view

and i would like to discuss it w/ u, cero143 person

well name some evolutionists that are unbiased towards creation

well, i went to the seminar, whcih took a few hours, and there was actual evidence he had collected, and if u really want to be open-minded, i suggest u do the same, they can be free, so u dont have to pay for it and support it either

Answer 1

I don't believe in evolution but thanks a lot for the site.
Yes, it has to do with my religion. I will give the site to my friends.

Thanks again.

Answer 2

Just the name of that website says a lot. A creationist cannot be a true scientist because he's already got a pre-formed conclusion (God made the world), then he picks and chooses the evidence that seems to support it and discards the rest. Sorry, but that's not science.

It should also be noted that proving X to be false does not automatically mean Y must be true. Even if creationists could somehow prove that evolution is false, it does not follow that Creation is the only other possible explanation. I don't think they get that.

Answer 3

andrea c. has hit the nail on the head with her answer. It has to do with religion. Not science. I suggest to you that, if this person is a scientist, it is in a field not related to biology. You say that you have studied evolution, but how well did you understand it. Most creation science relies on the inability of science to explain evolution to the satisfaction of Creationists. It then claims that evolution cannot be true because it can't be seen to be happening here and now. But they do not prove Creation true by displaying something being created.
.

Answer 4

Unfortunately, some of the arguments presented at the site are horribly flawed. i am not going to go into them specifically as it would be a waste of my time since people like you will find evidence to support what you believe and ignore the rest, so there really isnt a point. If you wish to discuss it further, i would be happy to, but first, it is pretty clear that you have no idea at all what evolution actually is, so start there.

Answer 5

> "this is an actual scientist (YES, scientist, who actually uses science) to disprove evolution"

Really? Maybe I missed it, but I can't find any references of the "actual scientist" on this site. What degree, what field, from what institution?

Answer 6

Went to your site and the section, " ten evidences for creation ". There were only attacks on evolutionary theory; not one iota of evidence was presented. This is called, " an argument from ignorance ". In your case, meant literally.

Answer 7

One disproves it and 50 million prove it. Work it out. Who has proved the existence of God?

Answer 8

that may be true, but i can find a million and one that do still believe in evolution and i cant find one that cant prove evolution didnt happen. thanks for trying though.