2007-05-16 14:49:55 · 14 answers · asked by Dr.alqpoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Better healthcare for American citizens. Better schooling for American children. Social security rights to AMERICAN citizens only.
Basicly someone who would take care of Americans 1st. Pay off our debt 2nd. Then do federal charity work for poverty around the world.
2007-05-16 19:07:40 · update #1
Hilary!!
2007-05-16 14:52:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Madison Augustine Primus will give citizens the right to receive the benefits of social security and healthcare early when they're in a life and death situation, http://www.voteprimous.com
2007-05-16 17:21:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
none of them. i'd choose to be certain a president good on unlawful Immigration. yet i'd additionally choose to be certain government out of our lives thoroughly appropriate to preparation and so stated as advantages. those issues could be dealt with on a interior of sight point. government has finished an extremely undesirable activity with preparation. on no account in the past have we thrown extra money into it and gotten such undesirable consequences. Why? because of the fact government became into on no account meant to be in contact interior the 1st place! The have a bloated paperwork that spends an excellent form of the income the past it gets to the place it became into meant to pass to interior the 1st place, the youngsters! we choose a president who would enable us to maintain much extra of our not elementary earned money because of the fact it fairly is us the human beings who run the financial gadget that helps them. the extra suitable the financial gadget the extra human beings there are that are working and the extra taxes they get to assist repay the deficit and shop the politicians fat and happy. lol
2016-11-04 04:30:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think Jerry Falwell just nominated Newt Gingrich!!
He was cold enough to serve his wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital-and isn't his new wife someone he had on the Govt. payroll while they were-well whatever.
Now that's looking after American Citizens rights and benefits- at least his ex wife got govt health insurance I would think.
Go Newt GO!!!!
2007-05-16 15:14:53 · answer #4 · answered by riverwooddude 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Out of all of them, John Edwards. He seems the most personable, honest, and down to earth guy. He doesn't smear, he just tells it like it is.
He did get a $400 hairvut, but not with taxpayers money..with his own...remember he can afford to have an expensive haircut...now if he really did, who knows? The media will make up anything nowadays.
2007-05-16 15:52:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barack Obama
2007-05-16 15:36:34 · answer #6 · answered by Erin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of increased rights and benefits do you have in mind. I'd have to say that the benefits would come from Dems and rights would come from either party, depending on what kind of rights you had in mind. There's too candidates for me to focus on right now.
2007-05-16 14:55:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to the law of unintended consequences probably Pol Pot, but he's not in the running.
2007-05-16 14:54:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm beginning to think Ron Paul wouldn't be too bad. Somehow he seems to have kept his common sense through these last few years. Amazing.
2007-05-16 15:20:25 · answer #9 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you understood anything at all about the philosophy upon which the US was founded, you'd know that no President has the power to increase or diminish individual rights. They just are.
If you understood anything about history, you'd also know that the government that grants you benefits need not be as concerned about observing your rights.
2007-05-16 14:54:50 · answer #10 · answered by open4one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
write in angela davis
2007-05-16 14:52:46 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋